McCann Files
EXCLUSIVE to mccannfiles.com
By Dr. Martin Roberts
March 22, 2011
"JUST LIKE THAT" - "AND SO, NO MORE"
There was Gerry McCann, the computer, doing his imitation of Kojak, while PJ was trying to get his attention, without much success, on an alleged sighting of his daughter. No doubt he was busy planning the marketing strategy. "So and so" (momentarily removing the lollipops mouth). Even the unfortunate magician prepares its actions. Who could forget the late Tommy Cooper (a contemporary of Max Bygraves in "varieties") and the number Hysterical "Glass Bottle. Glass bottle when he found himself unable to control the persistent appearance of bottles hidden inside the cylindrical container - "And just like that." Kojak and Cooper both operated with evidence, one eager to establish the truth and the other showing what was not. While Gerry McCann could aspire to be a kind of Kojak, actually leans more towards Tommy Cooper.
"You can not prove a negative," said Gerry, once. Speaks the voice of experience. It will not be because he has not tried. Like the magician, Gerry outlined his stall to convince the world of something that was not. Jon di Paolo, Sky TV, reporting live from the court of Lisbon in January last year we reported:
12:24: The lawyer of the McCanns said that "evidence" normally sightings - suggest that Madeleine is still alive.
12:25: He says that the McCanns are not responsible for generating any of these "proof" that her daughter is not dead.
(Quote) However, there are two things (end quote). Evidence to suggest that Madeleine is still alive sightings usually as implying that, on occasion can be otherwise. However, whatever the form of these "tests", the McCanns are not responsible for generating them (ie, manufacture) - said the McCann's lawyer, defending against a charge that has not even been made. So it should surprise no one wanted to learn about that possibility, right?
"Kate and I strongly believe that Madeleine was alive when they took the apartment. " That is encouraging, although it is difficult to see why Madeleine should not have been alive at that time, whenever that was. After all, left him sleeping. Although every belief has an element of uncertainty - otherwise it would be an act of faith, but a conviction based on fact. Given the scenario described so often in the past, this belief indeterminate invites two questions at once: "Madeleine was alive? Was Madeleine asleep? Considering that not even Kate and Gerry could not be absolutely sure, it stands to reason that they have provided a degree of caution on the part of your audience and also the best way dispel the doubt is, of course, provide supporting evidence.
All together now: The McCanns are not responsible for generating any of these "proof" that her daughter is not dead.
are not responsible for the sightings around the world, discredited almost as quickly as they are raised, and we must understand, those reported in Portugal, particularly in Praia da Luz, both before and after he was reported missing Madeleine. This would include the "evidence" attributable to Jane Tanner, the Smith family and, lest we forget, David Payne.
is important to that the McCanns and their friends put your disbelief mark very soon, to give the PJ a timeline representing a typed statement made on behalf of a committee. It follows from this simple act of collusion, if nothing else, that the many statements made by that person then can not in any way constitute a corroboration "independent" at all.
So, if you decided to challenge the "belief" of Madeleine McCann that was alive at 21h05 this Thursday night, based on the assertion that Gerry was asleep, we can not find confirmation the good health of Madeleine based on the sighting of David Payne a little earlier that afternoon. Although the membership of David Payne in this eventual "committee" should consider the veracity of his version in the light of their claims to have seen Madeleine last time, twice - at 17h00 and 18h40 later on! Therefore, there is no independent corroboration that Madeleine was alive this Thursday night. Just have a word for the McCanns, that is, the word of a couple who, for the duration of the official investigation, were considered suspects in the disappearance of her daughter. Alleged sightings that took place later (ie, those of Tanner and Smith) do not attest to the state it was the girl who witnesses may or may not have seen being carried through the streets. For one of the Smith had asked "Are you asleep?" Confirms that they could unknowingly be the case. Neither Jane Tanner could have deduced both a glimpse of legs dangling.
If Madeleine's physical condition Thursday night that can be questioned, you can question his drowsiness. "We believe" is clearly not sufficient to dispel any suspicion. But what to do about it? Well, if it had been taken that night her room so she should, without question, to be asleep. And if she was asleep would be dressed appropriately, that is, in his pajamas with a description. Therefore, to describe the pajamas would somehow confirm the version, is not it? Madeleine disappeared with this particular pajamas, especially for an audience emotionally prepared, a more convincing image of a nighttime abduction.
The first reference to pajamas comes from Madeleine McCann, in their witness statements on 4 May. For its part, the suggestible Jane Tanner quickly displays what can only be described as a progressive memory improved, skipping gears like a car with a faulty clutch, a man carrying something, carrying a child in pajamas, carrying what is supposed to a little girl in pajamas, based on a top "Pink", which is completely hidden from view and in spite of a street light "orange." Showed the same determination that the police officer who interviewed a year later in the course of the interviews Rogatory in Leicester Station "think pink".
Jane Tanner (member of the test do not forget) supports the story of pink pajamas after 21h05 but for some reason that only he himself knows, David Payne fails to point out this detail. He would like us to believe that Madeleine was perfectly fine in the McCann's apartment that afternoon. In his interview Rogatory mentions having seen all the children, but dressed in "sleeping dress" predominantly white. Interestingly Kate also declines to clarify what Madeleine was wearing at this time. In his statement of September 6, 2007, describes what she was wearing (a green long sleeve shirt, blue jeans, sneakers and white socks) and "putting on pajamas and diapers twins, "but does not reveal how, exactly, was dressed Madeleine.
Therefore, once again, just have a serious claim to the enforcement of an important detail. And once again attributable to the McCanns, who "are responsible for generating any of these" proofs "that daughter is not dead."
Leaving aside the question of whether Madeleine McCann was actually kidnapped on Thursday night, actually there is no evidence in the form of independent corroboration, that was healthy earlier this afternoon, or withdrawal of the apartment while he slept, as the insistent reference to his pajamas should make us think. And if you think this is a kite in the air, then please remember another notorious grammatical slips Kate McCann:
"I know that what happened is not due to having left the children sleeping. "
" I know it happened under other circumstances. "
The crux of this verbal contortions in particular is that" circumstances "in this case are not in themselves grounds. Leaving a child sleeping is not necessarily committing an act which contributes to the negligence that leads to an unfavorable outcome. Parents do it all themselves when they go to bed (that is, leave their children sleeping). Kate McCann clearly equates "leave the children sleeping" to "other circumstances." Whatever what "happened" was independent of both.
However sightings ... sightings!
Very well then. The sighting (that of Jane Tanner can send it to the realm of Hans Christian Andersen.) The only remotely credible reference to a little girl seen on the streets of Praia da Luz the night of Thursday, May 3, 2007, is the one offered by family members Smith, for reasons totally disinterested, they contacted Portuguese police in relation to their collective experience, which gave a detailed report in due course - on May 26, 2007. Here are three statements that relate more to the little girl who were being transported on 21h55.
Martin Smith
• She was wearing light colored pajamas. You can not say for certain color.
Aiofe Smith
• The material WAS Could Have Been and light cotton. He was wearing light trousers, white or pink, that could have been a pair of pajamas. Can not remember if they had a drawing and it was dark.
• Also has a clear top, long sleeves. Did not see it because the guy with his arms around the girl. Not sure if the above was part of the same color as the pants but the pants were clear.
Peter Daniel Smith
• Can not remember the dress very well but believe it was summer clothing, light colored.
bold and frankly would be speculative to conclude even that the girl seen by Smith in the dark wearing pajamas, but one pink, rose a much less similar to that allegedly belonged to Madeleine, as revealed by the unauthorized release of the time was short sleeves.
"Madeleine was alive when he was" taken "? The McCanns believe so. Were you asleep when he was "taken"? The McCanns have told us that he was. Is there an unequivocal confirmation of an independent party with respect to any of these details? No. And just like that.
Mercedes Translation
0 comments:
Post a Comment