Friday, March 25, 2011

Unemployment Certification Process Georgia

Madeleine McCann case: "JUST LIKE THAT" - "AND SO, NO MORE"

McCann Files

EXCLUSIVE to mccannfiles.com

By Dr. Martin Roberts
March 22, 2011

"JUST LIKE THAT" - "AND SO, NO MORE"


There was Gerry McCann, the computer, doing his imitation of Kojak, while PJ was trying to get his attention, without much success, on an alleged sighting of his daughter. No doubt he was busy planning the marketing strategy. "So and so" (momentarily removing the lollipops mouth). Even the unfortunate magician prepares its actions. Who could forget the late Tommy Cooper (a contemporary of Max Bygraves in "varieties") and the number Hysterical "Glass Bottle. Glass bottle when he found himself unable to control the persistent appearance of bottles hidden inside the cylindrical container - "And just like that." Kojak and Cooper both operated with evidence, one eager to establish the truth and the other showing what was not. While Gerry McCann could aspire to be a kind of Kojak, actually leans more towards Tommy Cooper.

"You can not prove a negative," said Gerry, once. Speaks the voice of experience. It will not be because he has not tried. Like the magician, Gerry outlined his stall to convince the world of something that was not. Jon di Paolo, Sky TV, reporting live from the court of Lisbon in January last year we reported:

12:24: The lawyer of the McCanns said that "evidence" normally sightings - suggest that Madeleine is still alive.

12:25: He says that the McCanns are not responsible for generating any of these "proof" that her daughter is not dead.



(Quote) However, there are two things (end quote). Evidence to suggest that Madeleine is still alive sightings usually as implying that, on occasion can be otherwise. However, whatever the form of these "tests", the McCanns are not responsible for generating them (ie, manufacture) - said the McCann's lawyer, defending against a charge that has not even been made. So it should surprise no one wanted to learn about that possibility, right?

"Kate and I strongly believe that Madeleine was alive when they took the apartment. " That is encouraging, although it is difficult to see why Madeleine should not have been alive at that time, whenever that was. After all, left him sleeping. Although every belief has an element of uncertainty - otherwise it would be an act of faith, but a conviction based on fact. Given the scenario described so often in the past, this belief indeterminate invites two questions at once: "Madeleine was alive? Was Madeleine asleep? Considering that not even Kate and Gerry could not be absolutely sure, it stands to reason that they have provided a degree of caution on the part of your audience and also the best way dispel the doubt is, of course, provide supporting evidence.

All together now: The McCanns are not responsible for generating any of these "proof" that her daughter is not dead.

are not responsible for the sightings around the world, discredited almost as quickly as they are raised, and we must understand, those reported in Portugal, particularly in Praia da Luz, both before and after he was reported missing Madeleine. This would include the "evidence" attributable to Jane Tanner, the Smith family and, lest we forget, David Payne.

is important to that the McCanns and their friends put your disbelief mark very soon, to give the PJ a timeline representing a typed statement made on behalf of a committee. It follows from this simple act of collusion, if nothing else, that the many statements made by that person then can not in any way constitute a corroboration "independent" at all.

So, if you decided to challenge the "belief" of Madeleine McCann that was alive at 21h05 this Thursday night, based on the assertion that Gerry was asleep, we can not find confirmation the good health of Madeleine based on the sighting of David Payne a little earlier that afternoon. Although the membership of David Payne in this eventual "committee" should consider the veracity of his version in the light of their claims to have seen Madeleine last time, twice - at 17h00 and 18h40 later on! Therefore, there is no independent corroboration that Madeleine was alive this Thursday night. Just have a word for the McCanns, that is, the word of a couple who, for the duration of the official investigation, were considered suspects in the disappearance of her daughter. Alleged sightings that took place later (ie, those of Tanner and Smith) do not attest to the state it was the girl who witnesses may or may not have seen being carried through the streets. For one of the Smith had asked "Are you asleep?" Confirms that they could unknowingly be the case. Neither Jane Tanner could have deduced both a glimpse of legs dangling.

If Madeleine's physical condition Thursday night that can be questioned, you can question his drowsiness. "We believe" is clearly not sufficient to dispel any suspicion. But what to do about it? Well, if it had been taken that night her room so she should, without question, to be asleep. And if she was asleep would be dressed appropriately, that is, in his pajamas with a description. Therefore, to describe the pajamas would somehow confirm the version, is not it? Madeleine disappeared with this particular pajamas, especially for an audience emotionally prepared, a more convincing image of a nighttime abduction.

The first reference to pajamas comes from Madeleine McCann, in their witness statements on 4 May. For its part, the suggestible Jane Tanner quickly displays what can only be described as a progressive memory improved, skipping gears like a car with a faulty clutch, a man carrying something, carrying a child in pajamas, carrying what is supposed to a little girl in pajamas, based on a top "Pink", which is completely hidden from view and in spite of a street light "orange." Showed the same determination that the police officer who interviewed a year later in the course of the interviews Rogatory in Leicester Station "think pink".

Jane Tanner (member of the test do not forget) supports the story of pink pajamas after 21h05 but for some reason that only he himself knows, David Payne fails to point out this detail. He would like us to believe that Madeleine was perfectly fine in the McCann's apartment that afternoon. In his interview Rogatory mentions having seen all the children, but dressed in "sleeping dress" predominantly white. Interestingly Kate also declines to clarify what Madeleine was wearing at this time. In his statement of September 6, 2007, describes what she was wearing (a green long sleeve shirt, blue jeans, sneakers and white socks) and "putting on pajamas and diapers twins, "but does not reveal how, exactly, was dressed Madeleine.

Therefore, once again, just have a serious claim to the enforcement of an important detail. And once again attributable to the McCanns, who "are responsible for generating any of these" proofs "that daughter is not dead."

Leaving aside the question of whether Madeleine McCann was actually kidnapped on Thursday night, actually there is no evidence in the form of independent corroboration, that was healthy earlier this afternoon, or withdrawal of the apartment while he slept, as the insistent reference to his pajamas should make us think. And if you think this is a kite in the air, then please remember another notorious grammatical slips Kate McCann:

"I know that what happened is not due to having left the children sleeping. "

" I know it happened under other circumstances. "

The crux of this verbal contortions in particular is that" circumstances "in this case are not in themselves grounds. Leaving a child sleeping is not necessarily committing an act which contributes to the negligence that leads to an unfavorable outcome. Parents do it all themselves when they go to bed (that is, leave their children sleeping). Kate McCann clearly equates "leave the children sleeping" to "other circumstances." Whatever what "happened" was independent of both.

However sightings ... sightings!

Very well then. The sighting (that of Jane Tanner can send it to the realm of Hans Christian Andersen.) The only remotely credible reference to a little girl seen on the streets of Praia da Luz the night of Thursday, May 3, 2007, is the one offered by family members Smith, for reasons totally disinterested, they contacted Portuguese police in relation to their collective experience, which gave a detailed report in due course - on May 26, 2007. Here are three statements that relate more to the little girl who were being transported on 21h55.

Martin Smith

• She was wearing light colored pajamas. You can not say for certain color.

Aiofe Smith

• The material WAS Could Have Been and light cotton. He was wearing light trousers, white or pink, that could have been a pair of pajamas. Can not remember if they had a drawing and it was dark.
• Also has a clear top, long sleeves. Did not see it because the guy with his arms around the girl. Not sure if the above was part of the same color as the pants but the pants were clear.

Peter Daniel Smith

• Can not remember the dress very well but believe it was summer clothing, light colored.

bold and frankly would be speculative to conclude even that the girl seen by Smith in the dark wearing pajamas, but one pink, rose a much less similar to that allegedly belonged to Madeleine, as revealed by the unauthorized release of the time was short sleeves.

"Madeleine was alive when he was" taken "? The McCanns believe so. Were you asleep when he was "taken"? The McCanns have told us that he was. Is there an unequivocal confirmation of an independent party with respect to any of these details? No. And just like that.

Mercedes Translation

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Best Ever Remedies For Oily Hair

Madeleine McCann case - I Want to Tell You A Story (I want to tell a story)


EXCLUSIVE to mccannfiles.com

By Dr. Martin Roberts
March 16, 2011

"I WANT TO TELL YOU A STORY" - "I WANT TO TELL YOU A HISTORY "



According to tabloids, Kate McCann 'wants to give an explanation / version of the truth about Madeleine."

to second the usual abuse apostrophe in English the preposition must come inadequate. Assuming that this "explanation / version" is even vaguely coherent, given that we know is now complete (384 pages, according to the Daily Express) why, in addition to worrying about the truth "about Madeleine", rather than her or its disappearance, is represented as a future desire, when it is a fait accompli? "I want" (as in, "I wish") is rather doubtful tone of an intention not yet performed. Instead of "in my book (or even" I have ") a complete (or accurate) explanation / version of the facts ... "etc., etc. we intent to present a futuristic version of the truth.

To the casual observer, the conduct of the McCanns and their idiosyncratic turns of phrase, it must seem totally foreign. Here, the author of what purports to be an important book, at least in volume, on the theme of the disappearance of her daughter while on vacation is the same person as a rebuke to see a journalist with the states "I I know. I was there, "after he complained publicly that he was not there at the minute."

Based
delivered in multiple versions so far as evidence by the McCanns and their friends, the latter variation does not need, in fact could not be extended to 384 words, much less to 384 pages.



"Madeleine was sleeping while we were out drinking and when I looked it was gone. I did not look after that. "FIN.

A short story, but nothing to send Maupassant.

Another short story inserted in the notice of the book in the Daily Express McCann, essentially as ambiguous and misleading Kate the statement, "Every penny we raise will be spent in our search," where it should be emphasized "our" rather than "search." "A few weeks after being abducted Madeleine ... the public's money came in abundance to help fund the massive search."

From the perspective of the generous public that is undoubtedly why people split your money - to help finance the huge search for Madeleine. But the scale of our search, ie the company should not be understood as "massive" in any way. Nor should be mistakenly associated with the massive search undertaken by the Portuguese immediately after Madeleine's disappearance - the largest search operation ever carried out in Portugal and one in which even participated willingly citizenship. What the McCanns received in return? "Plenty of thanks? No. Only criticism. Certainly not money. Nowhere in the published accounts of the Madeleine Fund, you will see an entry covering the inconvenience to the Portuguese.

Gerry's story

Those who have followed this case will be familiar with how these sly ingredients find their way into the story, going almost unnoticed among the current ennui that surrounds them. Such is the nature of narrative for the McCanns. And these are the details of the eventful journey home from Gerry McCann on June 19, 2007. You know, that during which provided medical assistance to a passenger on the plane. The plane was met by an ambulance and taken to evaluate anonymous passenger his unknown status, a hospital indefinitely. Not been heard from since. Now you might think that one of our tabloid newspapers at least had been interested in publishing an "I owe my life to the story of Gerry McCann. A missed opportunity.

A feature of the McCann's narrative that quickly involves the whole family, to the point where the players are capable, like Marcel Marceau, to take center stage without saying a word, while explanations, comments, etc. . arising in its name. In this case the exciting story has two chapters, the second related the loss of a wallet (and they say that lightning never strikes twice ...).

Gerry McCann's behavior at Waterloo station with his backpack, his wallet and "something else", is reminiscent of that puzzle Collegiate animal breeding, where a ranger is responsible crossing the river in a boat with a fox, a sheep and a duck in three trips or less. You can not bring with him more than two animals at a time, remembering that the fox will eat either other creatures if left alone with them. McCann version of the puzzle is, as usual, articulated by all except the author.

For starters, here's the synopsis of the Daily Mail:

"The pickpocket Gerry McCann acted while withdrawing cash from an ATM, just an hour after he arrived in London on a brief visit to organize the campaign to help find the girl of four years. "

In other words, while making the process of withdrawing money from an ATM, Gerry stole his wallet. (So \u200b\u200bis before the clerk.)

The Mail gives us then the corroboration of the family:

"Susan Healey, mother of his wife Kate, said it was" another kick in the teeth "

" He added: " Gerry is not clear exactly how he stole the wallet. "

"It was like she was dragged away."

again how operates an ATM? Credit card / debit card. And where we usually keep our cards? In our wallet. So if you are in a process of withdrawing money from an ATM, the card is in the machine and wallet in hand, until you're about to take the money, at which time all three will be a your hand (s ) (four items if you include the receipt).

But Gerry was not clear exactly how his wallet was stolen. Not see how she was dragged away. "

therefore clearly not happened," Gerry McCann while withdrawing money from the cashier, is not it?

Following the example of Mail, we will introduce a new commentator at this point - Philomena McCann:

He said: "Gerry was in the bank to get some British currency, because there was none at all.

"He withdrew £ 100 from a wall machine, put them in your wallet which in turn got into the back pocket.

"He bent down to put something in his rucksack and some dirty animal took his wallet from his back pocket."


The sequence of events here puts Gerry completing your transaction with the cashier before you put your wallet, which now contains the card you just used, along with the only English coin above it in the back pocket, where the rise was unfortunate as our busy tourist putting something else in your pack (using the hands that had just contain a wallet card, plastic and folding). What was this "something" and where it came? If it was large could not have been in their hands while driving the other objects. Still, if your wallet is going to walk from the back pocket, it is reasonable that you did not see the "hand" taking her. But would know exactly how it was stolen, although only in retrospect.

Best Man for a crisis, Gerry, who knew how and was not your wallet in your back pocket, acted spontaneously to an emergency, as he had done before in the plane. As Philomena told the Daily Mail:

"It is what it is trained, it is who you are. He did not do much about it because it's the kind of thing that makes all the time at work. "

The shrewd Gerry immediately canceled his credit cards (" He was forced to delay a series of meetings had planned while canceling their credit cards. "- Daily Mail).

Presumably, the pickpocket in question will think twice to register the other pocket looking for Gerry's mobile phone (or maybe it was this that is getting in the pack). Really lucky. Meant that Gerry was able to phone your bank immediately and report your loss. But where was he when he did? And how did it get there? Or was the cashier at the door of the bank branch to Gerry? Is that the only negotiable currency Gerry had in his possession had disappeared with his wallet (that's what she said Philomena) in a robbery in which the victim did not realize at the time (that's what you said Susan Healy). So Gerry was in a taxi moving to one of those meetings that was destined to be late, when he much he could not pay the fee, but at least had all the numbers stored in its memory banks of phone (well, you do not erase those, right?). Or was summarily dismissed by the driver in front of the branch concerned and cancel at least got one of his several cards at the counter. What about the others?

Or was, in fact, about to board a bus and found to have no money to pay the ticket, so I went back into the building Waterloo Station, where he denounced the robbery, first to a police service (who could not care less. Apparently, the police have no record of theft) after the cashier of the bank there. And, like Gregory Peck when he showed his note of a million pounds for the film of the same name, upon presentation of your passport and saying something like "You know you're talking to Miss", Gerry immediately gave him a loan window for living expenses.

Or perhaps coincidentally had a copy of The Big Issue hand and a broker who was passing by took pity on him.

Mercedes Translation

ITEM: In this article, Mr. Roberts failed to mention something to that recorded in the official process, the document sent by the British police authorities Portugal where, as noted, Gerry McCann did not have ANY credit card or debit .

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Game The Resetta Stone

Opinion: When rescue means dying

Because of all these weeks, developments in Japan by the earthquake and tsunami in the region of Fukushima and seeing how the Japanese government responded to international assistance offered by many countries, I wondered about this great dilemma that is considering in recent days on the international rescue community on ¨ Seek or not, to the rescue of victims in Japan in areas of potential radioactive hazard? ·

Introduction

I
that all who are dedicated to rescue, first aid and rescue We seared the powerful call of duty when a specific incident occurs, but more so, the bitter sense of saving life and alleviating pain / as victims during a disaster of this kind. Be of any force, unit, NGO or institution which is dedicated to this activity have a very strong commitment to service in pursuit of helping others. No doubt about it.

activity (or work for many) of rescuer, has a lifetime risk inherent to see us often engaged in hostile terrain and diverse dangers undoubtedly jeopardize our lives in the vast majority of missions. Be rescuer and be summoned to an emergency, means having physical skills, psychological techniques and unusual, to perform a specific task that just anyone can not know or do.
Only a person who engages in this activity and is out of his mind, may not recognize the potential hazards underlying any rescue mission. Whatever the activity (height rescue, underwater, marine, hazardous materials, etc.), All missions in greater or lesser extent share a common variable: The danger of losing his life. This danger has many facets within a mission, which can range from small, temporary or permanent injury and death undoubtedly the last of the cases.

Rescuers prepare us anyway to not only live with all these dangers, but to minimize these variables during a mission. Variables, which are not always within our reach to be 100% controlled.
Going to an emergency, gets the better of us and tests our expertise, knowledge and experience in the field of rescue during each mission. But speaking of variables: what happens when a known factor and lethal, but difficult to handle (in this case nuclear radiation), is in our theater of operations?

The case of Fukushima, Japan

Many, especially Experts in hazardous materials (HazMat ), will give lecture on personal protection and operation in environments with radiation exposure. But the truth is that radiation levels that no human being can tolerate (even equipped for that matter) and reduced exposure times to infer in our body in a lethal short, medium or long term. Today

read an article in Peopledaily ¨ ¨ (China) on the nearly 50 employees and 130 volunteers who are desperately trying to cool the reactors at the Fukushima nuclear plant. These true heroes (including engineers, technicians, firefighters, soldiers and police), according to experts, could lose their lives 70% of them in just two weeks (as reported by various media specialist), given the high levels of radiation detected in the plant. These operators work in shifts of only 20 minutes, after which lie in central units, which guarantees a higher level of protection.

The Ministry of Health of Japan raised from 100 to 250 millisievert the legal limit of radiation exposure you can get each worker, so they can stay longer in the plant. According to the daily · The New York Times ¨, this amount is five times greater than the maximum they are allowed to plant workers in the United States. Depending on the version of the Japanese Government and the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO ) there was a sharp increase in radiation levels in recent days, which was attributed to measurement error. At present, only 50 of the 800 workers (in addition to another 130 volunteers) from the plant are being charged with the dangerous task of trying to cool the reactors uncontrolled Fukushima reported the newspaper El Pais English ¨ ¨. Your task is to pump seawater into the uncontrolled reactor to contain the heating of the cores. To the malfunction of the normal cooling systems (because of the earthquake and tsunami), the 180 workers with only hand pumps for their task.

Willing to die

In an interview with international news network CBS , one of the workers, who said he had "no fear of dying" in its attempt to control the possible escape of radiation because " is their job, "inevitably remind me Kamikaze pilots during the 2nd . World War, which were determined to meet with death. Asked about the reaction, industry experts noted that nuclear is not surprising, but is the result of a mixture of sense of duty, loyalty and sacrifice for the good of the community, Japan.

AFP agency explained that the 4 reactors have overheated and threaten to collapse, causing an accident of incalculable proportions throughout the region, including the capital city of Tokyo.

Japan Prime Minister Naoto Kan, praised the efforts and courage of his countrymen who are in the nuclear plant. "TEPCO workers and the companies involved are working to pour water, to make every effort at the moment, without thinking twice about the danger," he added was quoted by AFP. For his part, Emperor Akihito spoke Fukushima reactor referring to them as "unpredictable" and urged the Japanese people to "Taking care of each other."

Rescue

After this preamble, and information about the picture of the situation in the northern region of Japan, is where I wonder how a rescuer can handle an unpredictable variable exogenous to the technical capabilities an operator and if it is viable or not a rescue by task forces from abroad. I wonder about the professional ethics and sense of duty; but also turn on the truth and the hypocrisy of not recognizing this factor by many rescue groups that have taken a step backwards in its decision to provide assistance.

About this I wonder: Is it wrong? You have to go at any cost? Own life and my men, who value? How many lives can be saved and what will it cost for me and my colleagues? If I survive, what are the consequences? People who rescue you, and are condemned to death by their own exposure to radiation? Worth offer my life in this case?

Bearing in mind that radiation can kill a person in minutes, hours, days, months or years; but surely altering the human body from skin burns to lymphatic cancer, thyroid and congenital diseases, I wonder if you rescue a life should mean losing mine or my personal and inevitably brings me back to an article I wrote last year entitled
"When the duty does not call us ¨.

One thing is certain as a colleague mentioned a few days ago - ¨ When you say NO, it will be the eternal question ...-.


leave open this profound debate controversial, but nonetheless necessary. Facundo García

Inst
Captain / Steering Committee



GOER © 2011 GOER
Licencia de Creative Commons

Eggwhite Cervical Mucus Tinged With Blood

News: Beneficiaries of the Annual Grant Plan 2011 GOER

On March 9 last, the executive committee met in special meeting, selected the two recipients Donation of Annual Plan 2011 GOER.

After receiving over 14 requests from all over the country, the steering committee evaluated the performance of the basic requirements for the award of the plan in each case, in addition to evaluating the strategic scope and impact of materials donated by region of the country, rescue unit, scope, commitment and professionalism of the participating entities. Soon we

posting information of each of the beneficiaries here in the blog.

© 2011 GOER
Licencia de Creative Commons

Negatives Of Hand Washing Clothes

2 º 4 HOURS OF RESISTANCE ITALICA 1 / 24 (3/26/2011) Survey


2 º 4 HOURS OF RESISTANCE ITALICA 1 / 24 (26/03/2011)

Monday, March 21, 2011

Gaymeetingplace India

Brain Protein Could Be Key to quit

The molecular mechanism that induces the consumption of large amounts of nicotine can be altered by manipulating levels of a specific brain protein, according to a study by the Scripps Research Institute in Jupiter (USA) published in the online edition of the journal Nature.

Nicotine stimulates alpha-5 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in the brain. This receptor is present in large numbers in a specific neural mechanism, the habenula-interpeduncular tract, which is known to suppress the signals of reward.

The scientists, led by Paul Kenny, show that mice lacking this receptor work for small amounts of nicotine, as normal animals, but also seek high concentrations of nicotine, which are normal animals and avoid unpleasant.

Experiences with rodents have shown changes

The authors show that alteration of receptor levels in the habenula-interpeduncular tract changes the amount of nicotine that animals consume.

The study could offer an explanation of why the genetic variation in the gene encoding the alpha-5 subunit increases vulnerability to addiction to snuff in humans, providing a negative signal in response to high levels of nicotine, thus limiting consumption.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Big Booty Pinky Weight Gain

Madeleine McCann Case: War of words hovering over books


March 20, 2011

By James Murray

The former Portuguese police chief Goncalo Amaral is ready for a new legal battle with Kate and Gerry McCann after writing a second book about her missing daughter Madeleine.

Mr Amaral's book will be published in Portugal next month just before Kate published her book entitled Madeleine fundraising.

could not come at a worse time for Kate, 42. She hopes that someone reading your book is presented with information about the person who took his daughter on May 3, 2007. (Item: Although it seems in no hurry to receive the information given that the book is finished since last November).

David Edgar, a private investigator for the McCanns is also ready to strengthen its team in Portugal to react quickly to any new track produced by Kate's book. It goes on sale in the UK on 12 May and a week later in Portugal.



The McCanns have already fought a costly legal battle on the occasion of the first book of Mr. Amaral on the case. Entitled Maddie: The Truth of the Lie, was pulled from the shelves for several months before being allowed out again for sale.

On Friday the McCanns lost an appeal to the Portuguese Supreme Court to stop the return of his first book on the shelves.

in Mr Amaral's book presents the theory that Madeleine died in apartment 5A at the Ocean Club in Praia da Luz in the Algarve. His conclusion angered the McCanns, who insist that there is no evidence to suggest that Madeleine died there and still have hope she's alive.

Now, stage is set for a new legal battle. Sophia, wife of Mr. Amaral said: "Gonçalo has been working on his book for about six months, spending days and nights evaluating all the evidence. Has put a lot of work into it. The title has not yet been decided and the date of publication will be decided this week.

"At this stage does not mean much, but say that his research was cut short and explain what he would have done if he had been allowed to continue. The book is not about Madeleine. It provides the history of other major cases have been involved.

"The time of this new book is just a coincidence, nothing was planned. We are not trying to make money on the fourth anniversary of the disappearance of Madeleine and not want to fight Kate's book. "

Mr. Amaral was a senior officer in the case but was dismissed after criticizing British police for an alleged lack of cooperation.

After resigning from the Judicial Police, has become a bestselling author in Portugal and appears regularly on television news. Attempted to post The Truth Lies in the UK for no publisher has agreed for fear of being sued for libel.

is said that Kate McCann has been warned by his editor to be careful of saying about Mr. Amaral. However, it recounts his frustration towards him and his anger at what was the case.

The Sunday Express can also reveal that Mr Edgar has been made regular trips to Portugal to investigate clues in recent months.

A source said: "The investigation is very active. There is hope that Kate will book someone to come forward with this key piece of the puzzle. "

Mercedes Translation

COMMENT

Friday, March 18, 2011

2010 Obesity Statistics Graph

Madeleine McCann Madeleine Case McCann - Supreme rejects request


March 18, 2011

by Margarida Davimar


Kate and Gerry McCann want the Supreme Court annulled a decision of the Court of Appeals that allowed the distribution of Gonal Amaral's book, The Truth of the Lie. But judges have rejected the request.

The former police inspector Judiciary (PJ), Gonçalo Amaral, may re-sell the book on the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, The Truth of the Lie, which was withdrawn from bookstores after in the first instance, have been accepted the precautionary measure of parents The British girl disappeared in Praia da Luz.

Supreme Court judges have rejected the request for "extraordinary review" of the decision Court of Appeal, which quashed the precautionary measure filed by Kate and Gerry McCann.

The judges' decision may be appealed to the Constitutional Court but the failure would not have suspensive effect, so Kate and Gerry McCann will have to return all copies of Amaral's book in your possession.

Failure to do so, may even commit a crime of disobedience.

Contacted by SOL, the McCann's lawyer, Isabel Duarte, declined to comment on this ruling, which has not yet been notified.

Mercedes Translation

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Famous People With Kawasaki Disease

News: Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan

Because the events in Japan and public knowledge, we sympathize with the victims and families of this tragedy and turn to Japanese community in Argentina. Our sincere respect and deep desire for a speedy recovery from this small but great country that is showing incredible strength and courage at this very hard for those who are going through.
勇 気, 精神 と 日本 の 強 さ!

© 2011 GOER
Licencia de Creative Commons

Sample Covering Letter For Metal Detectors

Dentists used to remove pain daring necklines to patients


Dr. Marie-Catherine Klarkowski, who owns a dental clinic in Munich, said: "The most important thing is to remove the fear of patients. The vision of the cleavage distracts from the pain more quickly to customers. " He adds that "the mouths of some patients are already open before starting the session"



is not clear if patients feel less pain, but the number of customers going to Munich Relax & Smile has grown 30% from this change. Yes, all are male.

Dr. Klarkowski
came with this cool idea for an event of Oktoberfest (Beer Festival) after seeing the leering men over the waitresses in traditional dress in dirndl.


The change also applied to the clinic now has an alpine lounge with a fireplace, deer antlers on the wall and wooden benches for patients.


MUST BEAT THE COMPETITION

"The competition never rests. I know colleagues who have decorated their office with all Mickey Mouse and even the Star Trek theme, "said the dentist of 41 years.


"I prefer working with a dirndl, I enjoy to look good at work and much more funny since I have these clothes, "said Larisa Hrustic, one of the employees.


The shrewd tactic can be used in conjunction with a new device that filters the sound of the dentist's drill.


Connects to an MP3 player that touches the patient's favorite music and "locks" the noise of the drill.

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Continental Baking Company Fruit Cake Tin

News: rescue service in the Himalayas

A society made up of two helicopter companies in Switzerland and Nepal allows daring rescues the heights of Mount Everest and other peaks Himalaya. Finally
constituted
(After a test phase) in the month of April 2010, this service could mark a milestone in the salvage, but still has the approval of all members of the community of climbers.

A team of Swiss company Air Zermatt waited until June 2010 in the Khumbu region a Nepalese helicopter Fishtail Air signs . Upon request, the group can fly up to 7,000 meters. to come to the aid of an injured climber, being the last April 28, 2010 its first baptism of fire, in performing the Fixed Rope longest in the world in the Annapurna (See HERE .)

What the Swiss pilot and rescue your team can do, (but not groups of Nepal at that time), a climber is recovering from a steep costs without landing zone. To do use a cable known as ' fixed rope' or 'human sling', where rescue injured climber tied to the line and then both are high by helicopter and taken while hanging up the nearest landing medical assistance available.
Air Zermatt

became one of the pioneers of this type of rescue when it was first used in the 1970 athlete to pick one of the most difficult summits in Switzerland with almost vertical slopes, the north face Eiger .

Gerold Biner Zermatt Air told swissinfo.ch that of the 1,500 rescue missions that take place every year in Switzerland about a third are "String operations Fixed with human cargo. "

Partnering with Fishtail Air arose partly from the successful Air Zermatt maneuver in November 2009, to recover the body of the Slovenian climber Tomaz Humar who died high on the slopes of Lirung Langtang Nepal. Special training



Fishtail Air Five people visited Zermatt in early 2010 and could carry out missions with Air Zermatt to learn the operation of the system. Biner has no doubts about the ability of the Nepalese pilots, however, said that the fixed rope missions require special training.
"Flying around with a cable hanging from the helicopter and a human being at the end of the line, makes it harder for the pilot of the aircraft," Biner said.

Finally on 8 March, two members of Fishtail Air, Cpt. Ashish Sherchan and Mr. Anil Kumar Basnet (both Nepalese) are sent to Zermatt in Switzerland to take a certification course and fixed rope this spring in the Swiss Alps. Biner
considers that the presence of the crew of Air Zermatt in Nepal and could begin to create demand among companies active backpacking, hiking in the Himalayan nation.

Save Lives

"Undoubtedly, this type of rescue will save more lives because people with minor injuries or health problems such as altitude sickness can be helped, "wrote Kari Kobler, leader of a Swiss expedition found last year on Everest, in an email sent from a height of 6,400 mts.

however, thinks this kind of bailout will not take place at the same scale as in the Alps due to the greater distances between the heliports and climbing areas . This, besides the fact that many customers do not have insurance to cover the cost of a rescue helicopter.

's crime adventure

The veteran mountaineer, physician and writer, Oswald Oelz not trust the new development.

"You kill the adventure part," said Oelz swissinfo.ch. "In a few years could be as it is now on the north face of the Eiger. If he gets into trouble, just call the helicopter. In the past, you had to fight to leave or die. "

Oelz is a researcher in the field of acute mountain and has to his credit many first ascents and difficult climbs. In 1978 he was one of the two doctors Delivery who took part in the ascent of Everest for the first time without the aid of supplemental oxygen, Reinhold Messner by and Peter Habeler .

Oelz said the idea that a helicopter can come to the rescue may create a false sense of security "and that the aircraft can not fly in any weather condition. He added that the increasing use of helicopters could do the Everest so popular that it could become a 'Disneyland', the same could happen to Matterhorn in Switzerland.

Biner Oelz agree that the helicopters could be a regular feature at the top of Everest in a short time. The pilot of Air Zermatt and new president of IKAR-CISA, said that helicopters are now able to float around at 9,000 meters. (Everest is 8,840 m high), but not yet certified to exceed the 7,000 meters.

Source: Dale Bechtel, swissinfo.ch / Adaptation GOER

© 2011 GOER
Licencia de Creative Commons

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Hemmorhoid Brazilian Wax

slot magazines

We consulted our readers through the web (www.slotmagazine.es), which takes, in addition to SLM read the results below:

Hpo Scanner Could Not Be Initialized Windows 7

study shows that fast food increases the risk for depression


Researchers from the Universities of Navarra and Las Palmas de Gran Canaria have shown that intake of saturated and trans fats increases the risk for depression and, secondly, Olive oil protects against mental illness. Their work is published in the journal PLoS ONE. "


Researchers have confirmed these results after studying for six years over 12,059 volunteers SUN Project, for which data were available from their diet, lifestyle and health conditions, analyzed at baseline, during its course and end. Thus, the authors confirmed that despite the fact that at baseline none of the volunteers suffered from depression, the end of it there were 657 new cases.


In all these cases of depression, participants with high intakes of trans fats (those found in artificially in industrial bakery products and food quickly and naturally in some dairy products) "showed up to 48% higher risk of depression when compared with participants who did not eat these fat," says Almudena Sánchez-Villegas, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.


addition, the study showed a dose-response relationship, "in which the more trans fats are consumed, the greater the detrimental effect they produced in the volunteers," the authors write.
addition, the team led by Miguel Angel Martínez-González, University of Navarra, also analyzed the influence of polyunsaturated fats (Abundant in fish oils and vegetables) and olive oil on depression. "In fact, we found that these healthy fats, along with olive oil, are associated with a lower risk of depression," says Martínez-González. Results of the study



The study results support the hypothesis of an increased incidence of the disease in northern European countries compared to southern countries, where the prevailing patterns of Mediterranean diet. However, experts indicate that the incidence of the disease has increased in recent years and currently there are 150 million people affected worldwide.


The research was conducted in a population with a low consumption of trans fats, as supposed to only 0.4 percent of total energy consumed by the volunteers. "However, we observed an increased risk of depression by almost 50 percent," concludes Miguel Angel Martinez.


Finally, the analysis suggests that both depression and cardiovascular disease are similarly influenced by diet and could share similar mechanisms in their origin. This hypothesis is also suggested by numerous studies showing the harmful effects of saturated and trans fats on cardiovascular disease risk.

Monday, March 14, 2011

Canon Printer Calibration

McCann Madeleine McCann case: Madeleine, the Book of Kate: No. 1 in the list of best selling fiction


March 14 2011

Madeleine, the Book of Kate: No. 1 in the list of best-selling fiction.

Perhaps above all other cases, the missing girl Madeleine McCann, is the greatest tragedy that surrounds and MYSTERY.

Regardless of what really happened to the little girl, the facts surrounding his disappearance and whereabouts today are not only unknown, but in the absence of any evidence or discovery enlightening spectacular, very probably remain so forever .

movements, behavior and feedback from parents, Kate and Gerry McCann the night Madeleine disappeared, along with those of their friends have been the subject of much conjecture and speculation since May 2007.

newspapers, both here and in Portugal, suggested earlier that the course of events as they were explained and propagated by what has become known, with dissatisfaction, as the "TEAM McCANN, do not resist scrutiny.

Rich contradictions, non-corroboration of the statements of the "Tapas" and a strange and inexplicable behavior led some to suggest The McCanns and their holiday compatriots were hiding something.

the Portuguese police, the Judiciary Police previously recognized and respected worldwide, was less circumspect. Its September report Tavares de Almeida, then Chief Inspector, concluded (inter alia) that:
Madeleine McCann died in apartment resort on May 3, 2007.

took place
staging a fake kidnapping.

The McCann participated in reconciling the body of his daughter.


Of course, we now know that this statement must be wrong. We know this because the then Police Inspector leading the investigation, Gonçalo Amaral , was fired after complaining about the "interference" of the British Government in the case, allowing the British papers to clarify and explain the whole thing is in fact, a "Slow Portuguese Lush" and we refer to him forever as the "Poli Disgraced Maddie case."

also know that this report must be inaccurate because that nice man Richard Desmond (owner of Express newspapers, among others) he decided to republish some of the Portuguese press reports about the case, based on this report PJ, then went on to give to the McCanns and their friends almost ONE MILLION POUNDS ESTERILNAS among all, all of which ended in the bottom of Kate & Gerry ... (PERDÓN. .. I mean the bottom "Looking for Madeleine.")

Desmond, a man who enjoys a reputation as an individual and TERRIBLE BOLD made his newspapers explain that in fact "had not no evidence whatsoever" to support the theory that the McCanns were involved in the death or disappearance of Madeleine, stating they were " completely innocent of any involvement ."

Along with economic arrangements (for a lawsuit or even came to the jurisdiction of the Courts), the papers also included a host of covers of apology, an act described as "unprecedented " by the commentator Media, Roy Greenslade.

(Interestingly, despite the fact that many other newspapers and publications published reviews and in some cases identical, MUCH MORE arson, escaped both of the censorship and litigation.)

And of course, we also know that Tavares de Almeida statements must be wrong because after Mr. Amaral was dismissed and replaced, all police authorities PORTUGUESE were dismissed by the "Team McCann" and replaced by those great crime fighters globally recognized method 3, led by Detective Experienced Clarence Mitchell.

Frequent Mitchell Press Conference begged information about a welter of bizarre and contrived characters, pedophile kidnapped the newspaper story of this week or courtesy of a previously unknown witness who suddenly recalled a crucial bogeyman or individual (s) of malevolent aspect.

This, surprisingly, in turn plunged Jane Tanner in a moment of clarity, allowing Clarence report that she believed that these new "suspect" resembled the person carrying Jane had witnessed, which she believed was Madeleine, the apartment the night of May 3.

Of course, the testimony of Ms. Tanner itself has always been subject to scrutiny and debate, among other things because when he spoke with police for the first time on the "kidnapper" who claims to have seen, said I was not sure whether or not carrying anything. However, some months later, recalled that no one was carrying something, but someone that was a little girl.

wore pajamas identical to the one allegedly used Madeleine.

Of course, in other circumstances, this "witness" (Which the Portuguese authorities never gave any importance or reliability), would only be of little relevance, an anomaly inconsistent, if not for the fact that the Tanner sighting is the only proof that an abduction had taken place.

Fortunately for all concerned, not least for research, Jane had the opportunity to clarify all these apparent inconsistencies and blatant contradictions in their changing statement when interviewed by police in Leicestershire in April 2008. When asked to describe in detail the man who had been said (verbatim):

"You see, this is where, now, I'm really ... do not know if it's worth doing, because it's been since then. ... I've been when I led monitoring to see ... and I guess now is MURAT who wanted you to see and, you know ......... all other gadgets, I really do not know, but I think I prefer to hold on to what I said in my original statement, in terms of. .. because, though ... I mean, it comes back to the drawing, even when I did the sketch, at this point, you know, things were ... were muddy ... I had to do this sketch that first night I mean, I was taken to make the sketch, but I only had, errm ... software face, so ... you know ... and at that point I said, you know, is there? ... "I can do? ... because the clothes and it was the thing ... was what was most in my mind and then I remember telling the guy I met on the stairs above ......"
Is everything clear? Good.
But of course, the main reason why we know that Tavares de Almeida report is wrong is that in June 2008, the Portuguese led to another, final report, submitted to the Attorney General, (although surprisingly, this did not mention that invalidated the first, report "provisional" and actually uses much of its original contents, without specific findings of Almeida, of course).

This is the report, which the "Team McCann", newspapers and British media " exonerates" the McCanns of any involvement in the disappearance of her daughter. We know this because Clarence constantly refers to this report whenever you want to enhance their clients' innocence.

tabloid headlines and serious newspapers such as " police Madeleine McCann Kate and Gerry exempts to file the case " (The Telegraph) "Kate Gerry McCann exempt from the disappearance of Madeleine " (Sunday Times), "Kate and Gerry exonerated" (The People) and "Maximum Portuguese Police Authority prepared to exonerate Kate and Gerry" (The Sun) are quite unequivocal in their message: that the Portuguese finally admit what the British press, the McCanns and their supporters have been saying all along, is that Kate and Gerry are not involved in the disappearance of her daughter and Authorities Portuguese were clearly inept, "he drunken Portuguese ents" as they were often described.

Unless
.

That's not exactly true. It is true that this report (which raises the status of arguido McCann, along with Robert Murat) concludes that: "Despite everything that has been done and despite all our efforts and research lines has not been possible to obtain a sound and objective conclusion about what really happened that night, nor on the current whereabouts of Madeleine. "

(also clearly illustrated and show the great and hard work of the authorities and people Portuguese to try to find Madeleine, including sealing apartment, road blocks, house to house searches and a report of all information and sightings that passed through their offices, unquestionably refuting the claims of "Team McCann", his friends and the British press that police were useless, " awkward ").

Actually, it was not until recently that I listened to this report publicly available. My vile mind had already concluded that it was not worth reading because it was written probably at least consult with, and possibly approved by the Expert Detective Clarence Mitchell.

However, it is very clear after studying the document in an appreciable degree, one must ask exactly what passages refer to the British media when they assert that the report "exonerates" the McCanns and their friends of all guilt.

In fact, one wonders if actually read the report at all or have actually read a different report.

Because I can not think of any explanation to NOT address the following facts:

The report makes clear that there were "inconsistencies " surrounding the statements and testimonies of the McCanns and their friends , and that these inconsistencies could easily have been highlighted and addressed if it were not for the "lack of cooperation miscellaneous relevant witnesses."

comes to saying that the Portuguese fought for a reconstruction or reconstitution "key facts, but they could not do it because" some of the key members of the McCann holiday group "were not willing to return to Portugal .

The report goes on to specify that there were clear inconsistencies and irregularities with some of the statements made by the McCanns and their friends, hence the need for reconstruction particularly in relation to Jane Tanner's statements relating his alleged sighting of a "suspected kidnapper, commenting in particular that at that time, Gerry McCann and TV producer Jeremy Wilkins were in the same" small space ", but none of them saw or Tanner or the alleged abductor.

The report also suggests that reconstruction was necessary to determine how and when a kidnapper could have done, given the regularity and frequency of checks being made on children, as stated by the McCanns and their friends. The report certainly clear not only of this testimony, but also the ability of any kidnapping to enter and leave the apartment as proposed by McCann, through a small window of the apartment as is suggested, while carrying a child.

More importantly, suggests that the facts as presented by the McCanns and their friends contained inconsistencies and irregularities in relation to the whole period from 17.30 in the afternoon in question ("last time Madeleine and the twins were seen by someone other than their parents "), until about 22:00 when he denounced the disappearance of Madeleine.


The dissatisfaction of the police's version of events of May 3 was probably partly because of, as contained in document, a " typed report produced by the McCann holiday group after detailed joint meeting between them. A report of their agreements on their memories of the events the night of May 3 . "

(resulting in the McCanns and their friends had, as a testimony to the investigation, their versions of the night he was reported missing Madeleine after meeting to discuss and formulate in advance !

But ME, the greatest mystery of all matters related to the case provided by the media ignore this report lies in the incontrovertible evidence discovered by the Dogs Specialized Victim Recovery.

Although the report makes clear that these "signs canines", made by Eddie and Keela, the famous dogs "corpse" was not substantiated by the final results of the FSS Laboratory, (e he collected material was not attributed a particular person), it is obvious that the Portuguese were initially advised by the FSS of a match with Madeleine McCann (Correspondent Martin Brunt was warned of a correspondence with Madeleine 100% and reported both on television as in most newspapers and other means of communication with a corresponding rate variable).


But the mere fact that these dogs sniff ACCURATE and unquestionable sources of cadaverine and other biological materials in the apartment of the McCanns' hire car and personal belongings, and ONLY ON AND ON THOSE OTHER PLACES and FLAT, CAR OR OBJECT undoubtedly deserves attention even the most obtuse journalist.

But NOW, it seems, there is hope.

After years of "slanderous accusations " * "useless and harmful comments " * and "absurd speculations " * (* Copyright © C. Mitchell), at the end looks like we will receive the printed version, short, factually correct and honestly what really happened in Praia da Luz during that fateful summer of 2007.

In what is being billed as a " explanation / version of the truth" given by KATE McCANN, The Daily Mail reports that "the real story about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann is about to be revealed in an explosive new book advertised as the best seller of the year. "

(" Explosive?)

I'm pretty sure that Richard Desmond should be trying to run an ironic revenge on its own, as mentioned previously, expensive publications on the McCann case, because according to the Daily Express, the reason for Kate to write the book were " Simple. " "To give an explanation / version of the truth." However, the paper includes this statement right next to your review saying that Kate had signed a "billionaire publishing contract."

So, what could be as "explosive" in this explanation / version? What secrets will be so "stunning"? What is Kate willing to disclose, in a book described in one tabloid as the book " willing to reveal everything?

At the risk of ruining the plot for those willing to be appropriate and orderly queues at the door of their libraries, or those who are instructing their newsagents that they reserve a copy of the newspapers that are paying huge sums for serialization rights I will make a daring and educated guess and propose a synopsis:

1. Portuguese police are useless.


2. Madeleine was abducted, probably by a pedophile (s) or someone acting on behalf of a pedophile (s).


3. Portuguese police tried to implicate Kate and Gerry.


4. Madeleine is alive and one day be reunited with his family (at least until the good people and celebrities continue to send donations, items for auctions and other forms of financial or pecuniary advantage).


5. Portuguese police are useless.


6. Erm ... that's all.

which would probably not contain the book, is any explanation or answers related to the many questions that many followers of the case you might want to do. Questions

perhaps related to the blinds.
"Broken or forced? "Open or closed?
"Windows open or closed?
"patio doors open or closed?
"front doors open or closed?
"locked doors or closed doors unlocked?

Everything was witnessed during those first interviews (to be widespread rupture of the blinds during the interviews with relatives of the McCanns) but since it was Kate who found that her daughter had disappeared, and only SHE she knows for sure. Neither

undoubtedly Kate explain WHY, when he was confronted with irrefutable "Canine signs" of specialized dogs smell BOTH detected cadaverine as biological fluids, marking the presence of a dead human body , contacted the McCanns with attorneys for a man accused of murder had "successfully challenged Dog Test dancefloor", asking for advice, instead of collapsing uncontrollably to the revelation that suggested that his daughter had died in the apartment. Perhaps

Kate also enlighten us as to why, in the middle of the night, she clearly thought that the best person to find Madeleine would be a Catholic priest.

And because the McCanns have become a sort of predilection for regularly write an entire cast of celebrities and other individuals asking for donations, his latest fundraising involved some bags donated by famous owners for a recent auction held to raise money for cause (in which Miongue Kylie was one of the donors), maybe Kate addresses the issue of this famous tennis BAG BLUE owned a bag that the Portuguese were so eager to find after she disappeared.

That the documentary Martin Brunt insisted that " could save key Madeleine's disappearance." That

whose whereabouts sought to establish the UK during subsequent police interviews members rogatory "Tapas." That

appearing in the photograph of the apartment of the McCann, Portuguese police as he presented to Kate, this time she chose not to answer any of the infamous 48 questions. " That

Clarence Mitchell insisted that never existed. "Gerry have never owned such a bag. In regards to Kate and Gerry, there is no missing tennis bag. Again home from holiday with everything except of course, tragically, Madeleine "he explains.

I have absolutely no doubt that Kate will regale us with horror stories about how he was pressured by the Portuguese police, on that famous negotiation (as explained Philomena McCann), which would mean a lighter sentence if he confessed to have been involved in the death of Madeleine.

But equally I have absolutely no doubt that categorically NOT explain all that led to his formation as an argument to start. The only thing that ALL media or was completely ignored, or chose NOT investigate or question.

that fact that is there in black and white, in the final report. The report on the Clarence and swears that "Team McCann" adhere to the time to explain his total innocence.


That which appears under the grounds of the judiciary police to declare the McCanns suspects:

"Kate Healy arguido was not immediately established, but merely as a witness interviewed voluntarily. Only after the interview was named arguido, that is, after being confronted with facts that could lead to their criminality . "

!

??? " ... facts that could lead to their criminality "??

Dinos, Kate. What were these " facts" that you were confronted? Certainly Kate

included in his story countless sleepless nights you experience regularly. That

while lying awake thinking.

Doubts, fears? "Guilt, guilt? Maybe.

Maybe also a bit of concern? "Concern for not knowing exactly what's in those other thousands of documents that the Portuguese still cling? Or maybe, given your apparently endless number of well-placed friends, worry because if you knew that contain these documents?

As has always been and perhaps always will in this case, the questions are piling up, but the answers never come.

So, in conclusion, I will answer one question that almost certainly respond Kate herself, in her book. The question is WHY has consistently denied, (along with her husband and friends) to participate in the reconstruction? Kate

going to tell us he does not trust the Portuguese police clumsy and useless, a force that not only tried to "incriminate" her and her husband, but did not look properly the person (s), who kidnapped his daughter.

Without doubt, cite all the "evidence" as those obtained by Method 3, with all the other dubious "detective agencies", a former special police and advisers to the means of the McCann presented as a former special police, evidence and suspects as published in every newspaper in the UK pedophile rings ranging from Third World "kidnapped to order", a known convicted sex offenders and dead who had a secret that never confessed.

The answer is NOT going to give is this:

can not rebuild a lie. You can not rebuild an illusion. Like any magic trick, only you can show your audience once, otherwise you will find out how you did it quickly.


God bless Madeleine McCann, wherever you may be ...


Spudgun Posted by journalist and filmmaker

Mercedes Translation