How To Beat Glandular Fever

Madeleine McCann case: Madeleine Missing Book is "truthful and acerbic" (Who let out to this woman?)

Anna Andress

November 25, 2010

Missing Madeleine book is "truthful and acerbic" (Who let out to this woman?)

The book written by Kate and Gerry McCann on the search her missing daughter, Madeleine, is "truthful and acerbic ," said Philomena McCann, Gerry's sister.

"Mainly we're doing and I know Kate has written some very truthful and poignant in relation to the Portuguese police."

my God! That may not be of great help, Phil. Portuguese police may not be very happy with that, and, well, your contributions to the case have not been very useful in the past.

May 5, 2007, two days after the disappearance of Madeleine.

The day care: "... people are leaving other people who do not know"

This is not a good start Phil because people were busy babysitting night was the same people who worked in the nursery during the day, where Kate and your dear brother were more than happy to leave their 3 children all day, all days.

"Gerry and Kate had a clear line of sight of their children."

Well, who told you that little lie, then, Phil? They did not have a clear line of sight of the apartment and her children were allegedly sleeping in a bedroom on the other side of the building.

"Someone with malicious intent came through the window and took Madeleine."

Ah yes! This was when you (and other friends and family) I was told that the window was open, the shutters had been forced and the door was locked, but that was before the police found out that there was no sign of force on things in which case, Gerry and Kate revealed that the patio door was not locked and if you started a fire! Will you have the "true " book, at last, why friends and relatives were informed of the shutter (not) enforced?

"... in any way suggest that parents Kate and Gerry are despicable / negligible (negligible) ... (ups) ... neglectful parents (negligent) "

Maybe you were actually thinking about their parenting skills, Phil. Despicable / negligible could be a good adjective to describe the parenting skills of people leaving three children under 4 years in an open apartment in a foreign country, night after night.

Interviewer: ... are tempted to go out and try to find themselves? "

Philomena: Yeah, well, I mean, Gerry and Kate want to go out there. They want to look everywhere. They do not want to leave any stone unturned, but that goes for all those with whom we have spoken. This crisis has affected so many people.

Phil, then why not go out there? "We will tell the book?

Gerry and Kate have not been told (the twins) where she is ... Ooooops!

not surprise me, Phil, you've disappeared from the media, especially after that comment yours on dogs highly trained trackers in BBC Five Live Breakfast

PM: Yes, I think she's still alive. We have no evidence against and in terms of finding specialized dogs smell to death on Kate, I mean, what is it? "Lassie? Is that going to talk to them and ask them what they're smelling? Kate is a doctor - what does that mean? You know, we have assigned a team that sent Kate smelling clothes and told the dog what to do. If they start to bark, how should we interpret that? Except, perhaps, they are "barking."

There is another good adjective, Phil, "Howl." Some might say you were "howling" lightly!

But anyway, Phil, you left out again, but again, you're not being helpful, I would say.

"Kate and Gerry feel a real responsibility that do not want to continue asking the public to support them, and this support has enabled them to move forward." (Press and Journal 11/25/1910)

But hey! Was there not a Paypal button on the website of the petition? So why not get a lot? That petition was launched on Wednesday, November 3, according to the Dail Mail which reported that:

The couple has written an open letter begging for help accountable and have launched an online petition to pressure the British and Portuguese governments to conduct a formal review of the case.

But less than two weeks later in a blog entry , Kate McCann have reportedly decided to "publish a book." Do not write a book, but publish it. Therefore, at this point the book already existed, that Kate and Gerry had decided to issue "with great regret." So what intended to do with the book if it was published? Two weeks after writing an open letter asking for financial support, Kate and Gerry do not want to ask the public support and coincidentally had a book with you to publish and raise money for the fund declined. Vale!

The older sister of Mr. McCann, Philomena McCann, 46, who lives in Ullapool in Wester Ross and is the director of social affairs at the local school, said Kate had finished writing and that the book was being edited (Press and Journal).

therefore decided to Kate and Gerry, with "great regret" to publish this book, instead of asking the public for more donations, but has been completed and is being edited? Was completed and delivered to edit before or after of this open letter asking for donations?

Ms. McCann said: "Mainly we're doing and I know Kate has written some very truthful and poignant in relation to the Portuguese police (Press and Journal).

Well, I hope that Kate and Gerry know that you said that Phil. I guess that either you were asked to say it as a kind of message to the Portuguese police or rush now to ensure that their attorneys to pass a red line on anything from that book "truthful and acerbic" that could be seen as defamatory.

my God! Could again be relegated to the closet, away from the media!

And finally! I'm intrigued by this quote from Kate McCann in Madeleine ind Web F:

"We hope this book also can help the investigation to find Madeleine in other ways. Our hope is that it may encourage those who have relevant information, knowingly or not, to come forward and share with our team, "

How do I know if I have unwittingly relevant information? How should I know anyone? Will it help the team McCann people to know they do not know and / or help those who unknowingly have information to remember that they know? How self-select people to contact the team? Should, because I do not know something, but you may not know if I know or not? You may unwittingly be sitting here not knowing what I know something ... or not! I think I'll lie down for a while!

Posted by Anna Andress

Mercedes Translation

Example Of Speech On Welcoming Guest

Madeleine McCann Case: Inside Out - The Madeleine Foundation

McCann Files

Inside

Out - The Madeleine Foundation BBC East Midlands

progrm delivered Monday, November 22, 2010
Transcript

By Nigel Moore

Marie Ashby: [to camera] Hello. Tonight, "Stresses Out" is in Rothley, in Leicestershire, to ask: "Who is the Madeleine Foundation?"

[voiceover] The parents of missing three years say they only increase their distress.

Kate McCann: [image file] There is a certain group out there that ... in fact this is his work, is to choose a vulnerable family and I am sure that after we pass to another family.

Marie Ashby: [voiceover]: And the people digging their own broadband network.

villagers

: This town will be transformed from a place that has a broadband connection that is not suitable for its purpose, in fact not available, to be literally the people with broadband nation's fastest

Marie Ashby: [to camera]: It has been described as "a club for psychopaths" that vile pamphlets. Its members insist they are only trying to find out what happened to Madeleine McCann. But parents say the small flame disappeared "Madeleine Foundation" is hampering the search for her daughter and increasing their anxiety. Simon Hare has been investigating.

Simon Hare: [to camera]: Well, it's Saturday afternoon and most people are busy enjoying their weekend. But somewhere, here in Nottingham, met a group of people to talk about Madeleine McCann case.

[phone] Hello, Simon ...

[voiceover]: The secrecy surrounding what has been billed as the annual conference of the self-Madeleine Foundation. They said that I can attend but I await news about the location. They told me to go to a hotel that offers conference facilities but this turns out to be only a meeting place. Then I moved to the true place: a place in this village of Nuthall. One member made some photos, including one by me. The President, Greville Green, Nottingham happy to be portrayed and the secretary of the organization and co-founder, Tony Bennett, is willing to promote his new book, consisting of selected excerpts from the case process.

[a camera] There were nineteen people at the meeting. I was told had come from across the country and a couple even had come from northern France. They did not want to enter the camera but I allowed me to sit there and take notes. Discussed many aspects of the McCann case and also sold me a copy of his new book. But for the moment I get closer to understanding exactly what's going on Madeleine Foundation.

Anne Davies: [image file] Well, among those reporters was Simon Hare, for East Midlands Today. He joins us from Portugal. Simon, can ...

Simon Hare: [voice-over archive images]: But I do know something about the Madeleine McCann case ...

[image file]: Good night, Anne, yes ...

[voiceover]: ... I was part of East Midlands Today team covering the events in Portugal. I interviewed the McCanns in Praia da Luz ...

Kate McCann: [image file] Actually gives you great power, really, to see everyone in town is, you know, give us your support and love and everything.

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: And three months later I was in Portimão, when they were made official suspects.

[a camera, stock footage]: The crowd of spectators, hundreds of people have appeared, many of whom booed when Kate McCann arrived ...

[voiceover]: A result, in largely due to this man. The Portuguese detective, Gonçalo Amaral.

Gonçalo Amaral: [speaking in Portuguese]

Simon Hare: [voice over]: But the case was dismissed in 2008, McCann saw their status as a suspect was removed.

Kate McCann: [archive footage]: We welcome the news today, but no cause for celebration.

Simon Hare: [voice over]: They won damages for defamation for some of the rough items they had engaged the press. A year later, covers other, thanks to the Madeleine Foundation.

Anne Davies: [archive footage]: The people living in the hometown of Madeleine McCann say they are disgusted of being subjected to a campaign to reopen the case against their parents.

TV presenter: [image file]: A group that says it wants "Justice for Madeleine" say they believe she was not abducted. Has been sending hundreds of leaflets in the area asking for support.

Simon Hare: [voice over]: They handed out 150 leaflets in the houses of the McCanns 'own neighborhood, repeating the now discredited theory that Madeleine had Amaral death in her parents' holiday apartment and that they had covered.

Reporter: [image file]: Now the people of Rothley, who spoke to us today, say they are horrified.

Villager: [image file]: It is absolutely disgusting. I think, personally.

locals: [image file]: I just think it's sad and sick that people have nothing better to do with their time.

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: I find the four people who distributed pamphlets that day, including Debbie Butler, the former president of the Foundation and co-founder that appears on the BBC to justify their actions.

Debbie Butler: [image file]: It is a nationwide campaign. We need to leave flyers in as many doors as possible ...

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: It has since had a falling out with Tony Bennett and is no longer a member of the Foundation but agreed to meet me near her home in Kent.

Debbie Butler: Mr. Bennett decided that we would go to that area, I'd never been there. He did. I learned that he had been there before. Errm ... I knew where we were. I was driving. Grenville Green and his wife Helene Davies went with us. We visited the farm to which Kate had taken the children and lunch is something there. Mr. Bennett handed out flyers there, alone, and instructed me that I deliver leaflets in the area near where the McCanns live. Errm ... what I did with Helene. And then he told me to deliver leaflets in your street, something I did. I was doing but Helene Helene Helene ... just ... I started shaking the legs and would not, so I did. Of course not left a brochure in your home (the McCanns).

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: Tony Bennett denies that he told Debbie Butler what he had to do that day. But both subsequently were sued by lawyers for the McCanns and in November of last year, Mr. Bennett assured the Supreme Tribuna not distribute brochures or lose more than fifty thousand pounds and even go to jail for contempt of court.

[Video of Tony Bennett and preparing a cart carrying a booth to distribute leaflets in Bristol, with background music:

"Pack up your troubles in your old backpack

And bury them underwater

I do not care what people may say

what people may say about me ... "]

Tony Bennett: [distributing a brochure to an audience member] ... on the, errr ... Madeleine McCann case.

Simon Hare: [voice over]: But this summer, Tony Bennett was distributing a new brochure.

Tony Bennett: [distributing a brochure to a member of the public]. Good morning, thank you very much.

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: It has come to Bristol for what was billed as "Awareness Day Gonçalo Amaral." Is accompanied by another member of the Foundation which is a bit embarrassing for the camera.

[The camera tries unsuccessfully to burn the person who hides behind a column]

Simon Hare: [off camera]: Are you hiding? Okay, I'll turn this side of the column. You are turning this side of ...

Receiver Brochure 1: [Tony Bennett]: There are some evil people in this world ...

Tony Bennett: Yes, there are some evil people.

Receiver Brochure 1: ... very evil. You know, I know what to say. I just think that has been stolen ...

Booklet 2 Receiver: [Tony Bennett]: There is a conspiracy theory about everything, right?

Tony Bennett: [to audience member]: True, true, yeah, many things about 9 / 11, yes, yes, I ... yes, there is ... no, I mean ...

[ Simon Hare]: People think we're representing the McCann somehow.

Simon Hare: Do not you worry about that?

Tony Bennett: errm ... actually, no, because it is an opportunity to explain to people, errm ... what we are doing and that there is ... a great mystery at the heart of this case.

Women in lane 1: I would not say in public what I thought it would be sued.

Tony Bennett: [to an older couple]: The NSPCC said that, errm ... you should never, let alone children of that age, even for thirty seconds ...

older man: No matter where you are ... The only place where you are sure ...

Woman: Anyway, I think nobody had the right to take it.

Tony Bennett: [a woman] No, no, no, no, that's true.

[off camera]: No doubt people will read this booklet as it passed through the village.

[to camera]: Not a single person has come to protest at all and say it's outrageous / egregious.

Simon Hare: [voice over]: But in the afternoon, there are some hostile reactions.

Female adolescent

1: It just seems a bit hard to start a campaign against it when there ... if you are abducted, are clearly struggling, coping with grief.

Tony Bennett: The question is. If she was abducted.

Female adolescent

2: And you believe at all that what you are doing is disrespectful?

Tony Bennett: errm ... I call it disrespectful.

Female adolescent

2: I will not read because I think it's a bit sick and very disrespectful, so ...

Tony Bennett: Okay. No matter.

Adolescent Male: I think it's a bit distasteful.

Women in lane 2: I have a daughter two years old, so you know, if I had ... if I had lost my daughter, well ... that woman, I ... I do not want to think that someone was saying that, in the street.

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: A few days later, after having delivered hundreds of copies, go to the application of the McCann's lawyers not to distribute this latest brochure. They would not talk to us about Tony Bennett's campaign, but on the third anniversary of the disappearance of Madeleine, Gerry and Kate McCann seemed to allude to the Foundation.

Lorraine Kelly: [image file]: You know, even today, some people are convinced that something had to do with it. How on earth is faced with that?

Kate McCann: [image file]: I think, I mean, I think that has changed. Errm ... I certainly do not have the same level of criticism before and even then, to be fair, in fact, was a minority. I think most people even if, you know, you do not agree with ... with, you know, what we did, did not seem right or just increase our suffering. But having said that, I mean, I think now only a small minority and you know there is a certain group out there that ... in fact his work, is to choose a vulnerable family and I'm sure that after we changed to another family.

Simon Hare: [off camera] I think he meant to you!

Tony Bennett: I did not hear that. I do not know if he meant to us or ... or not, but, errm ... we're focusing on this particular case. Errm ... I ... my focus is on the truth. The other members and supporters of the Madeleine Foundation is exactly the same. I have no history of persecuting people. Err ...

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: Earlier, Tony Bennett tried and failed to pursue an indictment against the McCanns for child neglect.

In 2006, he tried to organize a private prosecution against Michael Barrymore in connection with the night he died Stewart Lubbock at the home of TV presenter. Another high profile case in the center of media frenzy.

Tony Bennett was released by direct action on the conversion of signs.

Tony Bennett: [image file]: Most people do not want to see miles and meters in their signals.

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: A cause that made a lot of followers.

Female Voice: [off camera]: A little bit louder as if you ... There you go.

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: He began to remove road signs to campaign for the reintroduction of the old county boundaries.

Tony Bennett: [image file]: I think most of the public would like to see these signs. "Welcome to Lancashire" in the right border of Lancashire.

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: Unlike some of his colleagues he Madeleine Foundation seem to like the cameras and the visibility. Last year could be clearly seen sitting behind Gerry McCann, while testifying before the Parliamentary Subcommittee on Press and Privacy. Tony Bennett later published on the Internet ...

Voice actor: [, archive] was to send a silent message: We are looking over your shoulder, watching what he and his team are saying. Watching them.

Gerry McCann: [image file]: I think it's a matter of responsibility and report truths, innuendo and not making it appear as facts specializations.

Women: [image file]: I wonder how some of them can live with themselves.

Tony Bennett: [to Simon Hare]: If it is true that she was kidnapped then we are increasing their anxiety.

Simon Hare: [off camera]: And that .. Do you mind that? I mean, you're a parent, you grandfather.

Tony Bennett: errm ... I ... I am convinced that there are still questions to be answered, and ... and, errr .. as I say, and I must be careful what I say, but I question his ... his version of events and, errr ... if in fact Madeleine was abducted, as well ... like many other people.

Simon Hare: [off camera]: But I do not know what happened, I do not know what happened ...

Tony Bennett: No, I do not know.

Simon Hare: [off camera]: ... and only those responsible really know what happened ...

Tony Bennett: Yes, I agree, this according ... so I do not know what happened, so we can not say, errm ... you know, why can not we ... I mean, after all, if I wrong about something, if we are wrong in our website, errr ... errors may be challenged and refuted easily, right?

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: Internet is full of forums and messages about Madeleine. Some of these sites have been threats of violence towards the McCanns and their family home here in Rothley. Inside Out believes that the police have been involved in the past. The people who post on these forums are described as "pro" and "anti" McCann. Those related to the Madeleine Foundation have also been threatened.

Debbie Butler: At twelve o'clock rang phone and, errr ... I said before I stab my son, right in the heart. Call the police. Errm ... I've had other threats.

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: The Madeleine Foundation has come to London. More cards being delivered to both the Portuguese and the British government.

Tony Bennett: [to a police officer off-camera]: Then what happens? We call the door, someone is collected? Okay, yes.

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: The last brochure I agreed to stop distributing made a comeback.

Tony Bennett: Well, we, errr ... rethought about it and we see no reason why we should not distribute it. We were not threatened with a libel suit or anything. We have, errm ... three months ago we made the decision not to distribute it, but I reconsidered and we see no reason why we should not do, especially the birthday of Gonçalo Amaral.

Simon Hare: [voice over]: But in July, the McCann's lawyers, Carter Ruck, had threatened to bring Tony Bennett back to the Supreme Court. Your letter believed that the former attorney appeared not understanding how the laws of defamation.

Madeleine Foundation Member of: [to audience member]: So, if you want more information, our data are in the back.

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: I said that also persecute any other member of the Foundation to deliver the pamphlets.

But the two remaining dispatchers have not been to London. Grenville Green and his wife, Helene Davies-Green, have been discharged from the committee of the Foundation after she was described by The Sun as a "psychopath" distributing "flyers vile."

Helene Davies-Green: Helene Davies-Green: (preparing mushrooms in the kitchen): Most people avoid this because some are poisonous ...

Simon Hare: [voiceover]: was back to public scrutiny to stand as candidate for UKIP in the general election.

Helene Davies-Green: Apparently throwing the odd insult does not violate its code of conduct. Simon Hare

: [voiceover]: It is an example of freedom of expression does not like her husband. Earlier this year, Grenville Green went to Portugal to attend the hearing on the controversial book of Gonçalo Amaral.

Why am I here? There is freedom of expression right? If someone has a different opinion to another, errr ... should not have, errr ... cercarte and lots of money to shut you up, silence you, if you have a different opinion. So here I am. There is freedom of speech, freedom of expression. Simon Hare

[Gonçalo Amaral, archive images]: Is your book harming the McCanns?

Gonçalo Amaral: [asked to repeat the question]

Simon Hare: Is your book harming the McCanns?

Gonçalo Amaral: Ask McCann.

Grenville Green: [to Simon Hare]: This man is a hero, is a kind of Robin Hood today. It's like a fight between David and Goliath. If something is right, you know is right. If something is wrong, you know is wrong.

Tony Bennett: [to Simon Hare]: There will always be those who believe in the version of the McCann and I consider my, errr ... evil and perverted by what I do. Moreover, there are those who have legitimate questions and fully support what we do. Simon Hare

: [voiceover]: Earlier this month, the McCanns launched an online petition asking that the investigation into the disappearance her daughter was subjected to an independent review.

Gerry McCann: [image file]: There is absolutely no evidence that Madeleine has been seriously damaged, without that, we believe that we can still find it. Errm ... is difficult, we know, so we are asking for help and need support, the authorities must do more.

Last week, the McCann revealed they are writing their own book. In a statement on its website, Kate McCann said: "My reason for writing is simple, to provide a version of the truth / to account for the truth." Like the GM interview for TV, I can not help feeling that it was directed in part to the Madeleine Foundation.

Mercedes Translation

ITEM: Here is a new example of how to inform the British media about the McCann case.


demonstrate to them how important they are and NOT Madeleine McCann. So it seems they agree that research was NOT "independent" because they support a review of what has been done. They should remember that the research was conducted by researchers from a democratic country (Portugal) supported by researchers and experts from another country, allegedly democratic (United Kingdom). They should also remember that those who should do more to support research are the parents and friends, not governments. They may begin to clarify once and for all existing inconsistencies evident in their statements and may return to Portugal to participate in the official reconstruction of events that is still doing because they refuse to perform or is this the concept of support research to find her daughter?


The other day a follower of the theory McCann told me on the Tweeter that the reconstruction was set to "incriminate" parents and their friends and so refuse to do it but how can prepare a reconstruction of events based on official statements of those involved, to incriminate someone? The only case that could end "indicted" is if you have lied in those statements and this reconstruction proves it Is not this the real reason for their refusal?


Mr. Hare, I finished this translation went straight to the mirror to look at me well and I have no horns or tail. What I have is an IQ enough to understand that the McCanns and their friends are hiding the truth, enough IQ to understand that McCann have not done even half the effort to help the employee research to raise funds to continue paying the fees of large law firms and agencies specializing in image IQ enough to see that the suspects allegedly detectives hired to find Madeleine have done absolutely nothing but the deed of parents and deceive the general public, thus participating in the big scam being committed to raise money for a good cause and then spend it on a single concept of these statutes "support the family "not to" Madeleine Beth McCann. "


A Judge Hogg would say I hope you sleep well at night because SHE is the biggest culprit of Madeleine, his protege, not getting the justice he deserves. She has the power to audit the fund to "search" why not? Here I CI proves insufficient, I am unable to understand.

Where Can Iw Atch Aljazera Sport

BBC East Midlands Madeleine Case McCann: The timelines - completed

The Blacksmith Bureau

November 14, 2010

The timelines - completed

Tough luck, kid. There were other priorities

...

versions

Payne's family had a baby monitor did not have to watch your children during dinner. That left four members of the Tapas 7 saying that they did, the couple Oldfield, O'Brien and Tanner. The four stated emphatically in their police statements from May 4 that their children were controlled "every 15 minutes."

... and reality

Not a single member of the Tapas 7 and none of the parents gave the police the truth: that Madeleine McCann was controlled at most once throughout the night.

Evolution

Take a look back to the first timeline O'Brien:

20.45 Everybody in the pool for dinner

21.00 Matt Oldfield makes listening on the windows of the apartment 5A, B, D. All blinds are closed

21h15 Gerry McCann goes to the room? Bedroom door open.

21h20 controls 5D Jane Tanner sees a stranger carrying a child

21.30 0'Brien Russell is on the 5D, her daughter is sick

21h55

22.00

Alarm given after Kate

Now, can you see the importance of the entry of 20.45? The paper is an attempt show that, as he and the other three said, all children except those of Payne were monitored every 15 minutes - exactly. That is the reason why "everyone" had to be there at 20:45 - for the first and second "surveillance" to Madeleine took place exactly at 21h00 and 21h15.

far so good, unless it comes to a sudden halt. Where is the next control after 15 minutes - which would be scheduled at 21h30? Is not there. What about the 21.45? Where is that?

The second timeline is inserted surveillance at 21h30. But how can you be a "monitoring" if nobody seems to know whether, like the Schrödinger Cat, the girl was alive or dead, present or not after the sighting by Jane Tanner 21h20? And instead of the scheduled surveillance of 21.45 which again would have revealed if the child was present or not, just have a "Russell returns 21h50.

Mission Impossible

is clear that O'Brien attempted to prove that Madeleine McCann was in effect being controlled in intervals of fifteen minutes, as signed by the four, can not succeed even with the support Gerry McCann and David Payne.

Meanwhile Kate and Gerry McCann, whose match was so close to perfection that his statements appeared to the action of a synchronized swim team, told police the next day that the checks were made every half hour a much more difficult to refute. Others, however, remained at an unsustainable "every fifteen minutes," although they could not give examples.

Conspiracy

seems quite clear that there was a conspiracy coordinated by nine to get to join timelines on May 3 before meeting with the police. There was no time or opportunity to do so and gave statements to police are chaotically divergent. This refutes all notions that the girl may have suffered some damage before 17h30 on 3 May there a cover-up by the group efficiently. There was no cover, just a mess.

There Are, However, three and a Half Years Later, significant questions still Needing to Be Pursued. Exactly What WAS happening Between 9 and 9.30 pm? Why did O 'Brien's first timeline Suddenly run out of steam after 9.15, around the time of the supposed sighting? Something Had Happened? And just How Could a group supposedly responsible Have literally lost sight of one of Their Children for at least three quarters of an hour, Even Though One of Them Had seen a decidedly dodgy looking man hurrying away from the apartments with an inert child in His arms? Did it really never OCCUR to Jane Tanner to glance at Madeleine McCann's bedroom window as she Walked past it A Few Minutes Later, the memory of that far from reassuring stranger fresh in her mind?

However, there are three and a half years, important questions remain to be made. Exactly what was going on between 21.00 and 21.30? Why is the first timeline O'Brien collapsed suddenly at 21h15, more or less at the time of the sighting? Had something happened? And exactly how could a group allegedly responsible for literally losing sight of one of their children for at least three to four hours, although one of them had seen a man walking away hurriedly decidedly odd apartments with a inert creature in her arms? You really never occurred to Jane Tanner take a look at the bedroom window of Madeleine McCann as she passed before her only a few moments later, with the fresh memory of that little reassuring strange?

The agreement

The group, particularly the seven that made it so difficult to be able to answer questions. And still do. During the weekend after the first interrogation joined their memories of what he had told the police and boarded the Timeline # 3. It is important to note that the effort was not led or coordinated by the McCann but by David Payne.

is a plan to avoid a lawsuit against them for abandonment or neglect. Payne's plan can be seen emerging in interviews with police and was clear and simple.

None of us left his sons had made us think that the sound system Mark Warner was scheduled operating in this complex, as in all others, when we arrived we found out that it was not, so carefully put in place our own system based on the method of Mark Warner legally accepted - every half hour - but addition to visual surveillance, an improvement over that of MW. So we were following best practices.

Cuco right? Acúsennos and will have to accuse Mark Warner.

The group copied the timeline for the British consulate staff. The deception of the Foreign Office was not the result of his actions less selfish and irresponsible: the apparent good health that led to his conduct of the May 3 contributed to misunderstandings / differences between FOR and the Portuguese police.

by no means the agreed timeline was an attempt to help the investigation, but rather the opposite. With the abandonment of the start time at 20.45 these "regular checks" every fifteen minutes intervals became chaos and farce: Matthew Oldfield are moved like a puppet, controlling children whose parents apparently had just left them, chasing the "delayed" Payne and deciding to help his sick daughter O'Brien. After that it becomes blind.

The independent presence of Jeremy Wilkins unchanged leads to a situation similar to that of a finding that has diverted guardrails all trains in the same way: Tanner, Wilkins, Gerry McCann and the kidnapper converge, front, from different directions. The guardrails Payne tries to avoid the accident placing Jane Tanner in red in the Tapas Bar Gerry McCann while honking out front. Then you have to make stops McCann toilet and put Jane Tanner at an intersection of roads along with Wilkins and McCann. An intersection invisible.

course had never been a "system" of surveillance. It so happened that this night, Jane Tanner and her partner moved at intervals between the restaurant and the apartment because his helpless daughter needed frequent medical attention and visits around these forced his fairy tale, turned regular checkups. Others, then and in previous nights, perhaps - occasionally wandered at random to get some fresh air and take a look or listen, please. Apparently Gerry McCann returned to his apartment between 20h55 and 21h15. We do not know why. No one came to her or seen her again.

The crux

The three timelines and police interviews show including the way it was created a protective cover story, weak and ultimately unsustainable, to protect nine. Was held on 5 and 6 May. Was inconsistent with all his statements to the police.

There is no direct evidence that was created to protect Gerry and Kate McCann to a charge of involvement in the disappearance of the child, rather than an accusation of negligence. Undeniably, however, that the group itself lied and misled the Portuguese police, as the Express newspaper group, who received compensation for defamation improperly, they said.

The consequences were extremely serious and here we reach the central question of the whole case: the damage done to research and its absolute refusal over three and a half years to help remedy it. Specifically:

- Police clashed with undeniable evidence that the group was not telling the truth

- Faced with this the police had to investigate why and what could be hiding, spending time could have been used otherwise.

- The smokescreen created was much more difficult to obtain a clear picture of the movements of Gerry McCann.

- His lack of control over Madeleine McCann and her attempts to collective amnesia, made it impossible to determine the time of his disappearance

- His refusal to enter a new interrogation by Portuguese police made it impossible clarify their statements and

- As a direct result made it impossible for the prosecutor to exonerate parents and direct the search in other directions, a situation that continues today.

The Tapas 7 may at any time, providing fresh evidence the reasons for admitting lying to the Portuguese authorities. It just will not. And the parents would not ask. This is the reason for the clamor to return to Portugal is becoming stronger. Perhaps only an action by the Express Group to force them to defend their decision to mislead the investigation.

Posted by John Blacksmith

Mercedes Translation

To comment: Here

Multiplication Wheel Chart

Madeleine McCann Case: Collusion for beginners

The Blacksmith Bureau

November 12, 2010

Collusion

for beginners

move one and move all

timelines MATADOR

We are aware three people involved in the creation of the first two: Gerry McCann, David Payne and Russell O'Brien. Where? In the apartment 5A. When? Between, say, 23h30 and 2h00 on the night of 3 / 4 May. Need more details? Few: O'Brien, who had only been seen in possession of them by police Portuguese, has been questioned about them: that was in 2008 and then had forgotten all about them, even their very existence.

Timeline Third

This is different from the other two. Is a typed document that, according to David Payne, "represented the point of view of the whole group." It was completed after the initial police statements given on May 4 but before the second round of questioning on 10 May.

The group requested to bring their second interviews so they could refer to it! The request was denied. So far, in the light of day.

Grounds

The possible reasons are numerous and obvious. What is the explanation "not guilty", the participants have been given and that, in fairness, we should accept? After three and a half - no one! They do not accept or rebuild clarify movements claiming to have done. That is the crux of the question, "Why not?"

Gathering all the evidence is more favorable explanation is that the group conspired to distort tests in order to protect against potential charges of child neglect.

any other credible explanation is less favorable for the group.

Evolution

research groups in the "first cut is the deepest" when compared with other statements the first post and remain absolutely the same time is that there is no evolution. If changes, natural changes in the memory, should show a random pattern of disorder, since no one remembers the same things the same way.

Without

However, if there are changes that are clearly a pattern evolved and orderly conduct of the initial divergence close match, then something is wrong and the suspicion of collusion, conspiracy to arrange false evidence and dubious-reach level red flag. If at that moment in history remains fixed, no further development, then it's time that people start talking with their lawyers.

Evolution and the Tapas Nine

There is an unmistakable trend towards convergence in the T9 test, indicating the construction of a timeline that fit Persons facts. We can not bore the reader with all the many examples but will give only one, the early evening.

The testimony of nine witnesses who were at the Tapas Bar on 20.45, minutes up or down, it is quite clear. O'Brien's first timeline is based on what he saw and knew: "20h45 everyone in the pool for dinner." The second, after consultation with Gerry McCann, repeats: "20h45 pool." In his first statement to the police make a change, says he was "over" the 20.45 but now Payne says the group was not there. They arrived, says, five minutes later, 20h50.

David Payne, who helped create the first two timelines, was ahead in the game: he declared that arrived at the bar "on" 20h55 - but had not square with his family change: Fiona Payne, a very acute observer who was not involved in the first two timelines, said he had left at 20:45 to make the journey of two minutes to the bar. Dianne Webster says that "on" 20:45. None of them mentioned the encounter on the way Oldfield.

Famous for fifteen minutes

In his statement

Oldfield did not mention the encounter with them but it contradicts the three, saying they came at 21.00. Rachael Oldfield agree with the timing of her husband but remember that they came after Matthew, who apparently was doing his famous first night surveillance, which matched the first statement to the police of a group of couples that everyone was doing surveillance "every fifteen minutes." Go! Fifteen minutes was not in the chronology and the creators knew it. Matthew catch up! To complete the confusion Jane Tanner O'Brien said his family - he had written "20.45, everyone in the pool" - Had reached 21.00!

The day after these statements to the police and after discussions with the Payne wrote a third timeline. It is an absurd document while so dishonest that shoe fits these different memories in a narrative unsustainable. By the way, "Every fifteen minutes," was never mentioned.

And it was not a joke to fit every half hour. Payne changed the statement to his wife and his mother to say that "were coming" to the bar at 20h55, confirming that the meeting with Oldfield not previously mentioned. The vagueness of "were way "then becomes a farce by the clockwork precision of the" listeners MO at 20h57 (!) ... "

Although these changes could they explain to the police? David and Fiona Payne, after three and a half years have not yet done. Along with Kate McCann did not participate in the second round of questioning on May 10, leaving the old Dianne Webster on her own.

Early in his second statement Webster introduced a useful detail not previously mentioned, that although it was always dinner reservation for 20:30, the group "never met before 20h45/21h00" due to chronic lateness.

later "remembered" that had arrived late because he only managed to get to the restaurant on 21.00. Asked if he had "crossed" with someone (Obviously Oldfield included) down the road. Go! He said no.

(A year later, interviewed by police in Leicester missed the text again and fell into something closer to the truth - arrive at 20h50 or 20h55 - and, perhaps remembering some interesting conversation in another place, he added hastily "... er and what is not mentioned in the first statement in Portugal was that I vaguely remember seeing Matt, I was going ... "Go!)

In his second interrogation Matthew Oldfield was well informed about the third timeline, except Payne's fiction about the" listening Oldfield from 20h57 ... "Even Jane Tanner, who had not previously remembered nothing about the late arrivals except O'Brien, was a huge outburst syndrome Memory Recovery.

"recalled" that Oldfield had left "a few minutes before nine." Oh, and I remember talking about it before leave, announcing that he would quickly put him to the group, mecachis even recalled that "on the road took the opportunity to take a look at the rooms of children."

further deepens, like hypnosis. Jane Tanner reached the climax when "reminded" that Oldfield had crossed the Payne and Dianne Webster on the way and "made a circuit of listeners in the apartments." To be frank about it, and this applies to most other claims, "how did she know these things? I did not. Not remembering anything. There is, for whatever reason, trying to falsely corroborate the story of a friend to the police, a story about having no knowledge confirmatory. It would not be the last time.

a finished work of art - Timeline 3

2030: normal booking the group for dinner at the Tapas restaurant - like all week (Sun-Thur)

2035: Gerry McCann (GM ) and Kate McCann (KC) arrive at the restaurant table tops.

2040: Arrives Jane Tanner (JT), followed shortly thereafter by Matthew Oldfield (MO) and Mampilly Rachael Oldfield (RMO).

2045: Arrives at the table Russell O'Brien (RJO)

2055: MO returns to apartments for surveillance in the apartment downstairs, passing David Payne (DP), Fiona Payne (FP) and her mother Dianne Webster (DW) as they walked to the table.

2057: MO heard outside the windows of all apartments on the ground floor next to the parking (5A, 5B and 5D) to ensure they were sleeping. At this point, all the shades were drawn on every window.

2100: MO back to the table. Handle the first dishes.

[Omitted things post arrival]

Done - for now

So we see the evolution a current version, creating a fictional story that none of them could have known if it was true, which never deviated.

But you could say, is all this fuss just for ten minutes? Yes, because it is a vain attempt to make his alleged actions fit within the limited time that can not adapt to them, as, later, even moving around ten minutes, could not adapt / adjust to the alleged acts of Jane Tanner, Gerry McCann and Mr. Kidnapper: They were moving the pieces around the board but were moving as one, like a board game or Rubik's Cube, affected all others.

When Rachael Oldfield, asked by the BBC after the interviews rogatory if "history" had changed she replied, "No, because there never was a story to change."

Really?

You come here often? "You will return?

Posted by John Blacksmith

Mercedes Translation

To comment: Here

Office Building Plans

Madeleine McCann Case - If not ...

The Blacksmith Bureau

If not ...

... he

... or he

... or him ...

... is still to come.

November 10, 2010

Under the smoke and mirrors

Our friend Clarence Mitchell was honored by his peers for his achievements in the change of opinion about the McCanns. As fans of the couple known in the millions before hiring and are now in the light of the new request, something over thirty thousand, there must be a miscalculation.

Always

. People working in industry news and production have a natural tendency to overestimate the importance of his office. Sometimes the magnitude of the noise and excitement can lead others to think that the uproar of the media represents what is actually happening.

For the interviews, the acres of newsprint, campaigns, PR triumphs and disasters - in fact what have you got?

delay.

has not been achieved nothing else, no victory, no defeat, or the elusive "exemption" only delay. What is the delay but the temporary suspension of the crude reality, not reality itself? The last three and half years is equivalent to a long and protracted suffering of the protagonists of the case, dramatic, newsworthy, fascinating but ultimately futile. Much more they try to hide or disguise the truth, the worse.

Everything from a decision of parents and some friends, something that can never be undone, and tests are known, are documented and continue to surface. We move to the final stages the agonizingly slow-slow-demolition of his case piece by piece, not the media but in the interrogation rooms, law firms, courts and judges chambers.

is called collusion

As I pointed out to Mr. Simmons, the old is good. The examples given were all related and include more and more clarity in the midst of garbage questions answered (those that did not matter, as the "tenth tapas") and discarded theories (Gordon Brown, where are you?). This represents the prisoner attempted to escape prosecution that it conspired to hide the truth of what happened on 3 May.

As is well known the Tapas 7 have won substantial compensation in damages for defamation in relation to his conduct on May 3 and later, without testifying in court. According to a statement by Mr. Adam Tudor of Carter Ruck our friends, some of the agreements were for claims that "the friends had covered up the true facts and misled the authorities", in other words they had not told the truth. The newspapers did not defend the lawsuit.

That was in October 2008, three months after Stock clearance and release of the prosecution process, six months after the interviews of request, however details were not known by the British press at that time, more than a year ant4es the injunction hearings in Lisbon. If only the file's office really had meant the end of the case!

Again "" defamation "but this time with the irrefutable evidence that the papers lacked?

test Concatenation

As we know the police seized two "chronology of events (Timelines) "in the McCanns' apartment after midnight on 3 May.

rogatory

During interviews conducted in Leicester Tapas group members admitted that they were written with Gerry McCann almost immediately after calling the police, but were unable to give a coherent explanation for their creation either to content.

Its theme was "monitoring" the children, a critical issue and determined that the surveillance when he was last seen alive again, by whom and what windows of opportunity remained open, and without blind-to the girl may have been taken or had disposed of it.

The second leaves showed that they had discussed and corrected versions of who had seen the child and when. Therefore, it was probably not a memory register individually, but a collective agreement between them about what had been done.

file in the office of the prosecutor agreed with the police summary by pointing out explicitly that none of the nine had wanted to cooperate in clearing and reconstruction of what they claimed to have done and which formed a central part of their timelines.

It gets worse

But in a court in Lisbon, being questioned, the same prosecutor went much further. Says from the witness stand that parents had not only failed to clarify his statements but had not told the truth: the surveillance took place but was not as often as their "every thirty minutes."

This statement, as we said earlier, could not be explored in depth because under Portuguese law research a topic that has not been mentioned before the trial, is inadmissible.

But the "false" statements made on monitoring the McCanns were exactly the same with the members of the Tapas 7 were in agreement when prepared the timelines with Gerry! If he lied then, as night follows day, they must have lied too, since both their meetings in Portugal and the UK did exactly the same timeline that the McCanns.

Could return compensation?

might well ask the newspapers. But more important is the gradual discovery of truth, the way the group is slowly tightening. You will never have peace unless be voluntarily explain his actions and his lies, the Portuguese police: there is always a new audience, another court, another former police officer approaching the mystery of the conspiracy.

Until the inevitable happens, we can only keep asking, and ask readers to repeat to her:

Why do not you go back? What's stopping you?

Posted by John Blacksmith

Mercedes Translation

To comment: Here

Acura Panasonic Battery

Madeleine McCann Case: CLOUD CUCKOO LAND