Monday, March 14, 2011

Canon Printer Calibration

McCann Madeleine McCann case: Madeleine, the Book of Kate: No. 1 in the list of best selling fiction


March 14 2011

Madeleine, the Book of Kate: No. 1 in the list of best-selling fiction.

Perhaps above all other cases, the missing girl Madeleine McCann, is the greatest tragedy that surrounds and MYSTERY.

Regardless of what really happened to the little girl, the facts surrounding his disappearance and whereabouts today are not only unknown, but in the absence of any evidence or discovery enlightening spectacular, very probably remain so forever .

movements, behavior and feedback from parents, Kate and Gerry McCann the night Madeleine disappeared, along with those of their friends have been the subject of much conjecture and speculation since May 2007.

newspapers, both here and in Portugal, suggested earlier that the course of events as they were explained and propagated by what has become known, with dissatisfaction, as the "TEAM McCANN, do not resist scrutiny.

Rich contradictions, non-corroboration of the statements of the "Tapas" and a strange and inexplicable behavior led some to suggest The McCanns and their holiday compatriots were hiding something.

the Portuguese police, the Judiciary Police previously recognized and respected worldwide, was less circumspect. Its September report Tavares de Almeida, then Chief Inspector, concluded (inter alia) that:
Madeleine McCann died in apartment resort on May 3, 2007.

took place
staging a fake kidnapping.

The McCann participated in reconciling the body of his daughter.


Of course, we now know that this statement must be wrong. We know this because the then Police Inspector leading the investigation, Gonçalo Amaral , was fired after complaining about the "interference" of the British Government in the case, allowing the British papers to clarify and explain the whole thing is in fact, a "Slow Portuguese Lush" and we refer to him forever as the "Poli Disgraced Maddie case."

also know that this report must be inaccurate because that nice man Richard Desmond (owner of Express newspapers, among others) he decided to republish some of the Portuguese press reports about the case, based on this report PJ, then went on to give to the McCanns and their friends almost ONE MILLION POUNDS ESTERILNAS among all, all of which ended in the bottom of Kate & Gerry ... (PERDÓN. .. I mean the bottom "Looking for Madeleine.")

Desmond, a man who enjoys a reputation as an individual and TERRIBLE BOLD made his newspapers explain that in fact "had not no evidence whatsoever" to support the theory that the McCanns were involved in the death or disappearance of Madeleine, stating they were " completely innocent of any involvement ."

Along with economic arrangements (for a lawsuit or even came to the jurisdiction of the Courts), the papers also included a host of covers of apology, an act described as "unprecedented " by the commentator Media, Roy Greenslade.

(Interestingly, despite the fact that many other newspapers and publications published reviews and in some cases identical, MUCH MORE arson, escaped both of the censorship and litigation.)

And of course, we also know that Tavares de Almeida statements must be wrong because after Mr. Amaral was dismissed and replaced, all police authorities PORTUGUESE were dismissed by the "Team McCann" and replaced by those great crime fighters globally recognized method 3, led by Detective Experienced Clarence Mitchell.

Frequent Mitchell Press Conference begged information about a welter of bizarre and contrived characters, pedophile kidnapped the newspaper story of this week or courtesy of a previously unknown witness who suddenly recalled a crucial bogeyman or individual (s) of malevolent aspect.

This, surprisingly, in turn plunged Jane Tanner in a moment of clarity, allowing Clarence report that she believed that these new "suspect" resembled the person carrying Jane had witnessed, which she believed was Madeleine, the apartment the night of May 3.

Of course, the testimony of Ms. Tanner itself has always been subject to scrutiny and debate, among other things because when he spoke with police for the first time on the "kidnapper" who claims to have seen, said I was not sure whether or not carrying anything. However, some months later, recalled that no one was carrying something, but someone that was a little girl.

wore pajamas identical to the one allegedly used Madeleine.

Of course, in other circumstances, this "witness" (Which the Portuguese authorities never gave any importance or reliability), would only be of little relevance, an anomaly inconsistent, if not for the fact that the Tanner sighting is the only proof that an abduction had taken place.

Fortunately for all concerned, not least for research, Jane had the opportunity to clarify all these apparent inconsistencies and blatant contradictions in their changing statement when interviewed by police in Leicestershire in April 2008. When asked to describe in detail the man who had been said (verbatim):

"You see, this is where, now, I'm really ... do not know if it's worth doing, because it's been since then. ... I've been when I led monitoring to see ... and I guess now is MURAT who wanted you to see and, you know ......... all other gadgets, I really do not know, but I think I prefer to hold on to what I said in my original statement, in terms of. .. because, though ... I mean, it comes back to the drawing, even when I did the sketch, at this point, you know, things were ... were muddy ... I had to do this sketch that first night I mean, I was taken to make the sketch, but I only had, errm ... software face, so ... you know ... and at that point I said, you know, is there? ... "I can do? ... because the clothes and it was the thing ... was what was most in my mind and then I remember telling the guy I met on the stairs above ......"
Is everything clear? Good.
But of course, the main reason why we know that Tavares de Almeida report is wrong is that in June 2008, the Portuguese led to another, final report, submitted to the Attorney General, (although surprisingly, this did not mention that invalidated the first, report "provisional" and actually uses much of its original contents, without specific findings of Almeida, of course).

This is the report, which the "Team McCann", newspapers and British media " exonerates" the McCanns of any involvement in the disappearance of her daughter. We know this because Clarence constantly refers to this report whenever you want to enhance their clients' innocence.

tabloid headlines and serious newspapers such as " police Madeleine McCann Kate and Gerry exempts to file the case " (The Telegraph) "Kate Gerry McCann exempt from the disappearance of Madeleine " (Sunday Times), "Kate and Gerry exonerated" (The People) and "Maximum Portuguese Police Authority prepared to exonerate Kate and Gerry" (The Sun) are quite unequivocal in their message: that the Portuguese finally admit what the British press, the McCanns and their supporters have been saying all along, is that Kate and Gerry are not involved in the disappearance of her daughter and Authorities Portuguese were clearly inept, "he drunken Portuguese ents" as they were often described.

Unless
.

That's not exactly true. It is true that this report (which raises the status of arguido McCann, along with Robert Murat) concludes that: "Despite everything that has been done and despite all our efforts and research lines has not been possible to obtain a sound and objective conclusion about what really happened that night, nor on the current whereabouts of Madeleine. "

(also clearly illustrated and show the great and hard work of the authorities and people Portuguese to try to find Madeleine, including sealing apartment, road blocks, house to house searches and a report of all information and sightings that passed through their offices, unquestionably refuting the claims of "Team McCann", his friends and the British press that police were useless, " awkward ").

Actually, it was not until recently that I listened to this report publicly available. My vile mind had already concluded that it was not worth reading because it was written probably at least consult with, and possibly approved by the Expert Detective Clarence Mitchell.

However, it is very clear after studying the document in an appreciable degree, one must ask exactly what passages refer to the British media when they assert that the report "exonerates" the McCanns and their friends of all guilt.

In fact, one wonders if actually read the report at all or have actually read a different report.

Because I can not think of any explanation to NOT address the following facts:

The report makes clear that there were "inconsistencies " surrounding the statements and testimonies of the McCanns and their friends , and that these inconsistencies could easily have been highlighted and addressed if it were not for the "lack of cooperation miscellaneous relevant witnesses."

comes to saying that the Portuguese fought for a reconstruction or reconstitution "key facts, but they could not do it because" some of the key members of the McCann holiday group "were not willing to return to Portugal .

The report goes on to specify that there were clear inconsistencies and irregularities with some of the statements made by the McCanns and their friends, hence the need for reconstruction particularly in relation to Jane Tanner's statements relating his alleged sighting of a "suspected kidnapper, commenting in particular that at that time, Gerry McCann and TV producer Jeremy Wilkins were in the same" small space ", but none of them saw or Tanner or the alleged abductor.

The report also suggests that reconstruction was necessary to determine how and when a kidnapper could have done, given the regularity and frequency of checks being made on children, as stated by the McCanns and their friends. The report certainly clear not only of this testimony, but also the ability of any kidnapping to enter and leave the apartment as proposed by McCann, through a small window of the apartment as is suggested, while carrying a child.

More importantly, suggests that the facts as presented by the McCanns and their friends contained inconsistencies and irregularities in relation to the whole period from 17.30 in the afternoon in question ("last time Madeleine and the twins were seen by someone other than their parents "), until about 22:00 when he denounced the disappearance of Madeleine.


The dissatisfaction of the police's version of events of May 3 was probably partly because of, as contained in document, a " typed report produced by the McCann holiday group after detailed joint meeting between them. A report of their agreements on their memories of the events the night of May 3 . "

(resulting in the McCanns and their friends had, as a testimony to the investigation, their versions of the night he was reported missing Madeleine after meeting to discuss and formulate in advance !

But ME, the greatest mystery of all matters related to the case provided by the media ignore this report lies in the incontrovertible evidence discovered by the Dogs Specialized Victim Recovery.

Although the report makes clear that these "signs canines", made by Eddie and Keela, the famous dogs "corpse" was not substantiated by the final results of the FSS Laboratory, (e he collected material was not attributed a particular person), it is obvious that the Portuguese were initially advised by the FSS of a match with Madeleine McCann (Correspondent Martin Brunt was warned of a correspondence with Madeleine 100% and reported both on television as in most newspapers and other means of communication with a corresponding rate variable).


But the mere fact that these dogs sniff ACCURATE and unquestionable sources of cadaverine and other biological materials in the apartment of the McCanns' hire car and personal belongings, and ONLY ON AND ON THOSE OTHER PLACES and FLAT, CAR OR OBJECT undoubtedly deserves attention even the most obtuse journalist.

But NOW, it seems, there is hope.

After years of "slanderous accusations " * "useless and harmful comments " * and "absurd speculations " * (* Copyright © C. Mitchell), at the end looks like we will receive the printed version, short, factually correct and honestly what really happened in Praia da Luz during that fateful summer of 2007.

In what is being billed as a " explanation / version of the truth" given by KATE McCANN, The Daily Mail reports that "the real story about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann is about to be revealed in an explosive new book advertised as the best seller of the year. "

(" Explosive?)

I'm pretty sure that Richard Desmond should be trying to run an ironic revenge on its own, as mentioned previously, expensive publications on the McCann case, because according to the Daily Express, the reason for Kate to write the book were " Simple. " "To give an explanation / version of the truth." However, the paper includes this statement right next to your review saying that Kate had signed a "billionaire publishing contract."

So, what could be as "explosive" in this explanation / version? What secrets will be so "stunning"? What is Kate willing to disclose, in a book described in one tabloid as the book " willing to reveal everything?

At the risk of ruining the plot for those willing to be appropriate and orderly queues at the door of their libraries, or those who are instructing their newsagents that they reserve a copy of the newspapers that are paying huge sums for serialization rights I will make a daring and educated guess and propose a synopsis:

1. Portuguese police are useless.


2. Madeleine was abducted, probably by a pedophile (s) or someone acting on behalf of a pedophile (s).


3. Portuguese police tried to implicate Kate and Gerry.


4. Madeleine is alive and one day be reunited with his family (at least until the good people and celebrities continue to send donations, items for auctions and other forms of financial or pecuniary advantage).


5. Portuguese police are useless.


6. Erm ... that's all.

which would probably not contain the book, is any explanation or answers related to the many questions that many followers of the case you might want to do. Questions

perhaps related to the blinds.
"Broken or forced? "Open or closed?
"Windows open or closed?
"patio doors open or closed?
"front doors open or closed?
"locked doors or closed doors unlocked?

Everything was witnessed during those first interviews (to be widespread rupture of the blinds during the interviews with relatives of the McCanns) but since it was Kate who found that her daughter had disappeared, and only SHE she knows for sure. Neither

undoubtedly Kate explain WHY, when he was confronted with irrefutable "Canine signs" of specialized dogs smell BOTH detected cadaverine as biological fluids, marking the presence of a dead human body , contacted the McCanns with attorneys for a man accused of murder had "successfully challenged Dog Test dancefloor", asking for advice, instead of collapsing uncontrollably to the revelation that suggested that his daughter had died in the apartment. Perhaps

Kate also enlighten us as to why, in the middle of the night, she clearly thought that the best person to find Madeleine would be a Catholic priest.

And because the McCanns have become a sort of predilection for regularly write an entire cast of celebrities and other individuals asking for donations, his latest fundraising involved some bags donated by famous owners for a recent auction held to raise money for cause (in which Miongue Kylie was one of the donors), maybe Kate addresses the issue of this famous tennis BAG BLUE owned a bag that the Portuguese were so eager to find after she disappeared.

That the documentary Martin Brunt insisted that " could save key Madeleine's disappearance." That

whose whereabouts sought to establish the UK during subsequent police interviews members rogatory "Tapas." That

appearing in the photograph of the apartment of the McCann, Portuguese police as he presented to Kate, this time she chose not to answer any of the infamous 48 questions. " That

Clarence Mitchell insisted that never existed. "Gerry have never owned such a bag. In regards to Kate and Gerry, there is no missing tennis bag. Again home from holiday with everything except of course, tragically, Madeleine "he explains.

I have absolutely no doubt that Kate will regale us with horror stories about how he was pressured by the Portuguese police, on that famous negotiation (as explained Philomena McCann), which would mean a lighter sentence if he confessed to have been involved in the death of Madeleine.

But equally I have absolutely no doubt that categorically NOT explain all that led to his formation as an argument to start. The only thing that ALL media or was completely ignored, or chose NOT investigate or question.

that fact that is there in black and white, in the final report. The report on the Clarence and swears that "Team McCann" adhere to the time to explain his total innocence.


That which appears under the grounds of the judiciary police to declare the McCanns suspects:

"Kate Healy arguido was not immediately established, but merely as a witness interviewed voluntarily. Only after the interview was named arguido, that is, after being confronted with facts that could lead to their criminality . "

!

??? " ... facts that could lead to their criminality "??

Dinos, Kate. What were these " facts" that you were confronted? Certainly Kate

included in his story countless sleepless nights you experience regularly. That

while lying awake thinking.

Doubts, fears? "Guilt, guilt? Maybe.

Maybe also a bit of concern? "Concern for not knowing exactly what's in those other thousands of documents that the Portuguese still cling? Or maybe, given your apparently endless number of well-placed friends, worry because if you knew that contain these documents?

As has always been and perhaps always will in this case, the questions are piling up, but the answers never come.

So, in conclusion, I will answer one question that almost certainly respond Kate herself, in her book. The question is WHY has consistently denied, (along with her husband and friends) to participate in the reconstruction? Kate

going to tell us he does not trust the Portuguese police clumsy and useless, a force that not only tried to "incriminate" her and her husband, but did not look properly the person (s), who kidnapped his daughter.

Without doubt, cite all the "evidence" as those obtained by Method 3, with all the other dubious "detective agencies", a former special police and advisers to the means of the McCann presented as a former special police, evidence and suspects as published in every newspaper in the UK pedophile rings ranging from Third World "kidnapped to order", a known convicted sex offenders and dead who had a secret that never confessed.

The answer is NOT going to give is this:

can not rebuild a lie. You can not rebuild an illusion. Like any magic trick, only you can show your audience once, otherwise you will find out how you did it quickly.


God bless Madeleine McCann, wherever you may be ...


Spudgun Posted by journalist and filmmaker

Mercedes Translation

1 comments:

Calibration said...

just linked this article on my facebook account. it’s a very interesting article for all.
Calibration

Post a Comment