EXCLUSIVE to mccannfiles.com
By Dr. Martin Roberts
March 16, 2011
"I WANT TO TELL YOU A STORY" - "I WANT TO TELL YOU A HISTORY "
According to tabloids, Kate McCann 'wants to give an explanation / version of the truth about Madeleine."
to second the usual abuse apostrophe in English the preposition must come inadequate. Assuming that this "explanation / version" is even vaguely coherent, given that we know is now complete (384 pages, according to the Daily Express) why, in addition to worrying about the truth "about Madeleine", rather than her or its disappearance, is represented as a future desire, when it is a fait accompli? "I want" (as in, "I wish") is rather doubtful tone of an intention not yet performed. Instead of "in my book (or even" I have ") a complete (or accurate) explanation / version of the facts ... "etc., etc. we intent to present a futuristic version of the truth.
To the casual observer, the conduct of the McCanns and their idiosyncratic turns of phrase, it must seem totally foreign. Here, the author of what purports to be an important book, at least in volume, on the theme of the disappearance of her daughter while on vacation is the same person as a rebuke to see a journalist with the states "I I know. I was there, "after he complained publicly that he was not there at the minute."
delivered in multiple versions so far as evidence by the McCanns and their friends, the latter variation does not need, in fact could not be extended to 384 words, much less to 384 pages.
"Madeleine was sleeping while we were out drinking and when I looked it was gone. I did not look after that. "FIN.
Another short story inserted in the notice of the book in the Daily Express McCann, essentially as ambiguous and misleading Kate the statement, "Every penny we raise will be spent in our search," where it should be emphasized "our" rather than "search." "A few weeks after being abducted Madeleine ... the public's money came in abundance to help fund the massive search."
From the perspective of the generous public that is undoubtedly why people split your money - to help finance the huge search for Madeleine. But the scale of our search, ie the company should not be understood as "massive" in any way. Nor should be mistakenly associated with the massive search undertaken by the Portuguese immediately after Madeleine's disappearance - the largest search operation ever carried out in Portugal and one in which even participated willingly citizenship. What the McCanns received in return? "Plenty of thanks? No. Only criticism. Certainly not money. Nowhere in the published accounts of the Madeleine Fund, you will see an entry covering the inconvenience to the Portuguese.
Gerry's story
Those who have followed this case will be familiar with how these sly ingredients find their way into the story, going almost unnoticed among the current ennui that surrounds them. Such is the nature of narrative for the McCanns. And these are the details of the eventful journey home from Gerry McCann on June 19, 2007. You know, that during which provided medical assistance to a passenger on the plane. The plane was met by an ambulance and taken to evaluate anonymous passenger his unknown status, a hospital indefinitely. Not been heard from since. Now you might think that one of our tabloid newspapers at least had been interested in publishing an "I owe my life to the story of Gerry McCann. A missed opportunity.
A feature of the McCann's narrative that quickly involves the whole family, to the point where the players are capable, like Marcel Marceau, to take center stage without saying a word, while explanations, comments, etc. . arising in its name. In this case the exciting story has two chapters, the second related the loss of a wallet (and they say that lightning never strikes twice ...).
Gerry McCann's behavior at Waterloo station with his backpack, his wallet and "something else", is reminiscent of that puzzle Collegiate animal breeding, where a ranger is responsible crossing the river in a boat with a fox, a sheep and a duck in three trips or less. You can not bring with him more than two animals at a time, remembering that the fox will eat either other creatures if left alone with them. McCann version of the puzzle is, as usual, articulated by all except the author.
For starters, here's the synopsis of the Daily Mail:
"The pickpocket Gerry McCann acted while withdrawing cash from an ATM, just an hour after he arrived in London on a brief visit to organize the campaign to help find the girl of four years. "
In other words, while making the process of withdrawing money from an ATM, Gerry stole his wallet. (So \u200b\u200bis before the clerk.)
The Mail gives us then the corroboration of the family:
"Susan Healey, mother of his wife Kate, said it was" another kick in the teeth "
" He added: " Gerry is not clear exactly how he stole the wallet. "
"It was like she was dragged away."
again how operates an ATM? Credit card / debit card. And where we usually keep our cards? In our wallet. So if you are in a process of withdrawing money from an ATM, the card is in the machine and wallet in hand, until you're about to take the money, at which time all three will be a your hand (s ) (four items if you include the receipt).
But Gerry was not clear exactly how his wallet was stolen. Not see how she was dragged away. "
therefore clearly not happened," Gerry McCann while withdrawing money from the cashier, is not it?
Following the example of Mail, we will introduce a new commentator at this point - Philomena McCann:
He said: "Gerry was in the bank to get some British currency, because there was none at all.
"He withdrew £ 100 from a wall machine, put them in your wallet which in turn got into the back pocket.
"He bent down to put something in his rucksack and some dirty animal took his wallet from his back pocket."
The sequence of events here puts Gerry completing your transaction with the cashier before you put your wallet, which now contains the card you just used, along with the only English coin above it in the back pocket, where the rise was unfortunate as our busy tourist putting something else in your pack (using the hands that had just contain a wallet card, plastic and folding). What was this "something" and where it came? If it was large could not have been in their hands while driving the other objects. Still, if your wallet is going to walk from the back pocket, it is reasonable that you did not see the "hand" taking her. But would know exactly how it was stolen, although only in retrospect.
Best Man for a crisis, Gerry, who knew how and was not your wallet in your back pocket, acted spontaneously to an emergency, as he had done before in the plane. As Philomena told the Daily Mail:
"It is what it is trained, it is who you are. He did not do much about it because it's the kind of thing that makes all the time at work. "
The shrewd Gerry immediately canceled his credit cards (" He was forced to delay a series of meetings had planned while canceling their credit cards. "- Daily Mail).
Presumably, the pickpocket in question will think twice to register the other pocket looking for Gerry's mobile phone (or maybe it was this that is getting in the pack). Really lucky. Meant that Gerry was able to phone your bank immediately and report your loss. But where was he when he did? And how did it get there? Or was the cashier at the door of the bank branch to Gerry? Is that the only negotiable currency Gerry had in his possession had disappeared with his wallet (that's what she said Philomena) in a robbery in which the victim did not realize at the time (that's what you said Susan Healy). So Gerry was in a taxi moving to one of those meetings that was destined to be late, when he much he could not pay the fee, but at least had all the numbers stored in its memory banks of phone (well, you do not erase those, right?). Or was summarily dismissed by the driver in front of the branch concerned and cancel at least got one of his several cards at the counter. What about the others?
Or was, in fact, about to board a bus and found to have no money to pay the ticket, so I went back into the building Waterloo Station, where he denounced the robbery, first to a police service (who could not care less. Apparently, the police have no record of theft) after the cashier of the bank there. And, like Gregory Peck when he showed his note of a million pounds for the film of the same name, upon presentation of your passport and saying something like "You know you're talking to Miss", Gerry immediately gave him a loan window for living expenses.
Or perhaps coincidentally had a copy of The Big Issue hand and a broker who was passing by took pity on him.
Mercedes Translation
ITEM: In this article, Mr. Roberts failed to mention something to that recorded in the official process, the document sent by the British police authorities Portugal where, as noted, Gerry McCann did not have ANY credit card or debit .
0 comments:
Post a Comment