Sunday, March 6, 2011

Indiana Holograms License

Madeleine McCann Case - What Katy did next ...

Spudguns' Spoutings

What Katy did next ...

February 28, 2011

I would say that right now "enjoy" a reputation as a forceful critic of Kate and Gerry McCann.

I've always found quite amusing and occasionally frustrating (and I still think so) that because I consider myself a serious old investigative journalist with a few proud achievements during a period of 18 years, that my name only may be associated with my reflections and video related to a (still) unresolved and unfathomable event of a missing child.

When I see the multitudinous blogs and websites that vilify and subjected to all kinds of McCann conjecture and conspiracy theories curious, I am always surprised by the severity of the answers, abuse and messages that find their way to my mailbox. After all, I never specifically accused of anything.

I have never, for example, criticized for leaving their children unattended, something they did do, certainly in a much greater degree than we are led to believe (although I always found strange the reason why not accept the night babysitting services, especially as his three children spent most of their vacation time in day care).



Actually, I have not criticized the rather chilling and clinical development of the "Look for Madeleine", especially so soon after the disappearance of the girl, basically a Limited Company executed skillfully designed to make money and, erm ... generate money.

No. My criticisms and barbed comments have generally been reserved for his followers hangers, the list "Z" (and occasional "A" list) celebrities who were able to think they could improve their profile aligned to the high-profile cause McCann.

often admit having made special mention of course the British press, whose editorial policy is very clear to them being issued in the form of a combination of intimidation, cronyism and economic incentives. (Not to mention the threat of some large companies to refrain from spending more of their advertising budget with them, as has been pointed out to me by a former News Editor).

Maybe I can also have lashed out against certain factions of the previous administration "Nu Labour" (including the Prime Minister Gordon Brown) who sometimes spent more time organizing meetings world leaders and Papal visits to them and making personal phone calls with them that the time spent on some of the duties for which they were elected to carry out!

is also true, I must admit I could have booked a harsh word or two for the completely unique and unenviable once ubiquitous Clarence Mitchell.

Whoever decided that Mr. Mitchell would be the best spokesperson and representative of a couple who once faced serious criminal charges is in itself a mystery to me.

Here is a man whose main raison d'être is to produce, engineer and invent, a man whose previous role was basically most prolific spy on the British people through the monitoring of their views, thoughts and acts in his role as Director of the "Unity Media Monitoring" on Central Office of Information.

Its role? Basically "eavesdrop " (eavesdropping) and gauge public opinion, compared with the view that the Government had / have and control and influence that opinion to the government's thinking.

"The Central Office of Information (COI) is the government center of excellence for marketing and communications. Since 1946 we have worked closely with government departments and public sector to promote good practice and profitability in the way citizens are informed, engaged and influenced on issues that affect their lives - from health and education to benefits, rights and welfare. "

Yes Absolutely. I prefer my description.

But Clarence is not a man who lives and works convictions, morals, principles, general beliefs or allegiances. Clarence is a man of RENT. For whatever reason, provided the price is right.

is enlightening, it is not that man, who was instrumental in formulating the marketing and communications director of Nu Labour and their "Media Monitor", it should then work for, erm ... CONSERVATIVE during his last election as erm ... "Director of Media Monitoring?!

Like a mad scientist James Bond film, Clarice is basically a man skilled in snoop on what you think a nation, controlling the information that leads them to think that way, after speaking at the information in order to make them think otherwise!

insurance is a FACT that the vast plethora of stories that appear on virtually every British publication, related to Madeleine McCann, or have been written by or to security has been authorized by Clarence Mitchell.

Each "sighting" Maddie, the continuing abduction theory, each story of evil pedophile networks in distant lands, each detective, private investigator, super-detective and several other witnesses listed in the press with the latest theory / test / experience about where he was, is or could be Madeleine, had received the seal of approval of Clarence.

If you asked me 5 years ago if I thought a GROUP, (much less an individual) would or could, be sufficiently powerful or influential as to restrict a popular worldwide internet FORUM, to basically close, I would laughed.

But that is exactly what he did Clarence Mitchell, at a stroke.

The Mirror Group's popular MGM Forum, related to Madeleine McCann and signed by hundreds of thousands of readers, disappeared without a trace and without prior notice, except for a brief, single line explaining something about issues of "abuse."

At the time of its closure, a journalist who wrote for the Mirror, close to Editor officially told me that the Home Office had put pressure, but was, in fact, Mr. Mitchell who was the applicant successful (Mitchell has subsequently confirmed its role in closing the Forum).

Such is the power and influence of the man.

Here is a man hanging his coat on any major news item to appear, allowing you to spread their own agenda. Any another poor soul unfortunate enough to suffer the disappearance or murder of a child (or missing person / murder of any age), has secured advertising view kidnapped by the "thoughts and prayers" of Kate and Gerry.

Any history of trafficking or sexual exploitation of children anywhere in the world are sure to find the guarantee of Clarence "Kate and Gerry are aware of the events", intoning that such events could lead to Madeleine .

Do not worry if it is not enough reporting on tragedies, Clarence found another angle.

The current saga of "espionage" voice mail mobile phone risky by the News of the World inspired our man! Although there is absolutely no evidence to support it, and the fact that the Scotland Yard investigation has revealed nothing to confirm, Clarence is sure that his mobile phone was played!

By whom and for what purpose is something that is not clear, but gives you the opportunity to extend several column inches on their customers all day who will listen.

And, maddeningly, everyone loves to hear Clarence.

But I digress.

NEVER have tried, per se. I've never commented on their general behavior, his behavior, its curious and sometimes bizarre responses and reactions to the questions they pose.

I never assumed anything about his lack of genuine emotion, and Kate discussed why he behaved the way it did when it was officially incorporated argued, (not only unanswerable questions, but also certain irregularities involving members of MI5 I was attending, according to intelligence officials Portuguese).

right, YES I commented on the lack of evidence that showed when they made an extensive press conference where the McCann said that "they would not go to Portugal without Madeleine, 24 hours prior to argue and have been made 60 hours before, erm. .. to leave Portugal without Madeleine.

but I never seriously criticized or questioned a concrete act that either Kate or Gerry have assumed.

Until now.

Claudia Lawrence, a British 35, was last seen in March 2009. The pain and trauma related to his absence and uncertainty safely to his whereabouts should be huge for those who know and those who Claudia means something.

fate is unknown.

The Sunday, February 27, at York Minister held a candlelight vigil to commemorate the 37th birthday of Claudia, chaired by the Archbishop of York.

Of course it is true that in his local newspaper, Peter Lawrence, the father of Claudia, was quoted as saying he had "strong interest in others who have suffered the loss of a relative or loved one attend the vigil - making an open invitation. "

However, since there is absolutely nothing, ostensibly, that links to Madeleine McCann with Claudia Lawrence over the many thousands of missing people in the UK, a bastard cynic might suggest that such an event is merely making a golden opportunity Kate McCann to be photographed lighting a candle, pictured on the cover of every newspaper that covered the event.

But a vile publicity stunt would certainly be far beyond the confines of what even Clarence and the McCanns could be considered decent.

certainly would go
beyond the limits even the British press, allowing a very moving and sad vigil was overshadowed by using a similar photo opportunity. Never happen.

right?

Ooooer ... I can hear my beeping tray ...

Spudgun Posted by journalist and filmmaker

Mercedes Translation

0 comments:

Post a Comment