The Blacksmith Bureau
November 14, 2010
The timelines - completed
 |
| Tough luck, kid. There were other priorities |
...
versions Payne's family had a baby monitor did not have to watch your children during dinner. That left four members of the Tapas 7 saying that they did, the couple Oldfield, O'Brien and Tanner. The four stated emphatically in their police statements from May 4 that their children were controlled "every 15 minutes."
... and reality
Not a single member of the Tapas 7 and none of the parents gave the police the truth: that Madeleine McCann was controlled at most once throughout the night.
Evolution
Take a look back to the first timeline O'Brien:
20.45 Everybody in the pool for dinner
21.00 Matt Oldfield makes listening on the windows of the apartment 5A, B, D. All blinds are closed
21h15 Gerry McCann goes to the room? Bedroom door open.
21h20 controls 5D Jane Tanner sees a stranger carrying a child
21.30 0'Brien Russell is on the 5D, her daughter is sick
21h55
Alarm given after Kate
Now, can you see the importance of the entry of 20.45? The paper is an attempt show that, as he and the other three said, all children except those of Payne were monitored every 15 minutes - exactly. That is the reason why "everyone" had to be there at 20:45 - for the first and second "surveillance" to Madeleine took place exactly at 21h00 and 21h15.
far so good, unless it comes to a sudden halt. Where is the next control after 15 minutes - which would be scheduled at 21h30? Is not there. What about the 21.45? Where is that?
The second timeline is inserted surveillance at 21h30. But how can you be a "monitoring" if nobody seems to know whether, like the Schrödinger Cat, the girl was alive or dead, present or not after the sighting by Jane Tanner 21h20? And instead of the scheduled surveillance of 21.45 which again would have revealed if the child was present or not, just have a "Russell returns 21h50.
Mission Impossible
is clear that O'Brien attempted to prove that Madeleine McCann was in effect being controlled in intervals of fifteen minutes, as signed by the four, can not succeed even with the support Gerry McCann and David Payne.
Meanwhile Kate and Gerry McCann, whose match was so close to perfection that his statements appeared to the action of a synchronized swim team, told police the next day that the checks were made every half hour a much more difficult to refute. Others, however, remained at an unsustainable "every fifteen minutes," although they could not give examples.
Conspiracy
seems quite clear that there was a conspiracy coordinated by nine to get to join timelines on May 3 before meeting with the police. There was no time or opportunity to do so and gave statements to police are chaotically divergent. This refutes all notions that the girl may have suffered some damage before 17h30 on 3 May there a cover-up by the group efficiently. There was no cover, just a mess.
There Are, However, three and a Half Years Later, significant questions still Needing to Be Pursued. Exactly What WAS happening Between 9 and 9.30 pm? Why did O 'Brien's first timeline Suddenly run out of steam after 9.15, around the time of the supposed sighting? Something Had Happened? And just How Could a group supposedly responsible Have literally lost sight of one of Their Children for at least three quarters of an hour, Even Though One of Them Had seen a decidedly dodgy looking man hurrying away from the apartments with an inert child in His arms? Did it really never OCCUR to Jane Tanner to glance at Madeleine McCann's bedroom window as she Walked past it A Few Minutes Later, the memory of that far from reassuring stranger fresh in her mind?
However, there are three and a half years, important questions remain to be made. Exactly what was going on between 21.00 and 21.30? Why is the first timeline O'Brien collapsed suddenly at 21h15, more or less at the time of the sighting? Had something happened? And exactly how could a group allegedly responsible for literally losing sight of one of their children for at least three to four hours, although one of them had seen a man walking away hurriedly decidedly odd apartments with a inert creature in her arms? You really never occurred to Jane Tanner take a look at the bedroom window of Madeleine McCann as she passed before her only a few moments later, with the fresh memory of that little reassuring strange?
The agreement
The group, particularly the seven that made it so difficult to be able to answer questions. And still do. During the weekend after the first interrogation joined their memories of what he had told the police and boarded the Timeline # 3. It is important to note that the effort was not led or coordinated by the McCann but by David Payne.
is a plan to avoid a lawsuit against them for abandonment or neglect. Payne's plan can be seen emerging in interviews with police and was clear and simple.
None of us left his sons had made us think that the sound system Mark Warner was scheduled operating in this complex, as in all others, when we arrived we found out that it was not, so carefully put in place our own system based on the method of Mark Warner legally accepted - every half hour - but addition to visual surveillance, an improvement over that of MW. So we were following best practices.
Cuco right? Acúsennos and will have to accuse Mark Warner.
The group copied the timeline for the British consulate staff. The deception of the Foreign Office was not the result of his actions less selfish and irresponsible: the apparent good health that led to his conduct of the May 3 contributed to misunderstandings / differences between FOR and the Portuguese police.
by no means the agreed timeline was an attempt to help the investigation, but rather the opposite. With the abandonment of the start time at 20.45 these "regular checks" every fifteen minutes intervals became chaos and farce: Matthew Oldfield are moved like a puppet, controlling children whose parents apparently had just left them, chasing the "delayed" Payne and deciding to help his sick daughter O'Brien. After that it becomes blind.
The independent presence of Jeremy Wilkins unchanged leads to a situation similar to that of a finding that has diverted guardrails all trains in the same way: Tanner, Wilkins, Gerry McCann and the kidnapper converge, front, from different directions. The guardrails Payne tries to avoid the accident placing Jane Tanner in red in the Tapas Bar Gerry McCann while honking out front. Then you have to make stops McCann toilet and put Jane Tanner at an intersection of roads along with Wilkins and McCann. An intersection invisible.
course had never been a "system" of surveillance. It so happened that this night, Jane Tanner and her partner moved at intervals between the restaurant and the apartment because his helpless daughter needed frequent medical attention and visits around these forced his fairy tale, turned regular checkups. Others, then and in previous nights, perhaps - occasionally wandered at random to get some fresh air and take a look or listen, please. Apparently Gerry McCann returned to his apartment between 20h55 and 21h15. We do not know why. No one came to her or seen her again.
The crux
The three timelines and police interviews show including the way it was created a protective cover story, weak and ultimately unsustainable, to protect nine. Was held on 5 and 6 May. Was inconsistent with all his statements to the police.
There is no direct evidence that was created to protect Gerry and Kate McCann to a charge of involvement in the disappearance of the child, rather than an accusation of negligence. Undeniably, however, that the group itself lied and misled the Portuguese police, as the Express newspaper group, who received compensation for defamation improperly, they said.
The consequences were extremely serious and here we reach the central question of the whole case: the damage done to research and its absolute refusal over three and a half years to help remedy it. Specifically:
- Police clashed with undeniable evidence that the group was not telling the truth
- Faced with this the police had to investigate why and what could be hiding, spending time could have been used otherwise.
- The smokescreen created was much more difficult to obtain a clear picture of the movements of Gerry McCann.
- His lack of control over Madeleine McCann and her attempts to collective amnesia, made it impossible to determine the time of his disappearance
- His refusal to enter a new interrogation by Portuguese police made it impossible clarify their statements and
- As a direct result made it impossible for the prosecutor to exonerate parents and direct the search in other directions, a situation that continues today.
The Tapas 7 may at any time, providing fresh evidence the reasons for admitting lying to the Portuguese authorities. It just will not. And the parents would not ask. This is the reason for the clamor to return to Portugal is becoming stronger. Perhaps only an action by the Express Group to force them to defend their decision to mislead the investigation.
Posted by John Blacksmith
Mercedes Translation
To comment: Here
0 comments:
Post a Comment